January 06, 2010

IMD Essays for January 2011 Admission

IMD (The Institute for Management Development), consistently ranked among the best MBA programs in the world, is a small intensive one-year program that starts in January.  IMD, along with Columbia January Term and INSEAD (INSEAD has both September and January start dates) are three of the best options for those who want to start in January 2011 at a top MBA program.

To learn about IMD, visit the website. You should download three PDFs from the website: "MBA Program Brochure," "MBA Class Profiles," and "Class and Placement Overview." I will refer to these below. In addition, if possible, I suggest either attending an information session or visiting. Getting an alumni perspective would also be particularly helpful. Review the website completely and by all means read the MBA Diary to get IMD students' perspectives. To learn about IMD faculty perspectives, please visit Tomorrrow's Challenges.

7/6/09 UPDATE: I also suggest reading my Q&A with a former client who is a member of the Class of 2009. I think this interview will provide you with some key insights into IMD.

IMD's small size sets it apart from other top programs, as its brochure states: "90 Exceptional People Who Will Shape The Future of Business." While it is not easy to get into IMD, it has an acceptance rate of 28%, it has an 86% yield, one of the highest yields worldwide. (If you get into IMD, chances are quite high that you will go there.)

When you think about IMD, two keywords to focus on are "international" and "leadership." Based on my experience working with clients admitted there for both the Class of 2009
(See here for my client's testimonial) and Class of 2010 (See here for my client's testimonial), I can say that IMD is looking for those individuals who both already have and aspire to increased capacity in both being international and being leaders.

Like its bigger rival INSEAD, IMD is truly an international program with a very diverse student body and faculty. You can actually view all of the Class of 2009 as well as read a statistical summary of their backgrounds on PDFs found on the IMD site. Doing so will certainly help you understand that IMD students are incredibly diverse and multilingual.

The IMD program is focused on making leaders, not managers. It also is not designed for those who want to develop expertise in a business subfield. IMD makes the program's focus very clear on page 2 of the PDF version of their brochure:
Top executives of leading multinational companies tell us clearly: they need leaders, not managers. Leaders with the insight and ability to address issues and problems that are more complex and changing more quickly than ever before. Leaders who are confident, creating their own solutions to these emerging issues with integrity and high ethics. Leaders who understand themselves and how they interact with others. Leaders who understand the needs of their organizations and their business environments. Leaders who can drive change through innovation. Leaders who can move their businesses forward. The single aim of the IMD MBA program is to develop these leaders.

If you are not looking for an education focused on leadership, do not apply to IMD, but if you are, IMD offers a very intensive one-year leadership education:
The program starts with a foundation in the core business courses, e.g. accounting, finance, marketing and operations. This helps you to understand all of the functional areas of the organization and how they work together. It continues with real-world projects and additional courses that allow you to apply what you have learned in the classroom to real leadership situations

A review of the program structure makes it perfectly clear that it is not a degree for those wanting expertise in a particular business subfield
(e.g. finance or marketing) because there is actually only one three-week period of study available for electives.


THE QUESTIONS
Considering the above, I will analyze IMD's 12  "essay questions." I have taken the questions from the online application.  While there are 10 questions that are called "Essays" in the application, there are actually 12 such questions. I think IMD's "essay" designation  is incredibly confusing for no particular reason.  As you will see the first two questions below are clearly essays, whereas some of IMD's "essays" are more administrative questions.

Position sought after graduation
Please give us your short term career goal post MBA (up to 5 years). Describe how the IMD MBA will help you achieve this goal and how you will approach your job search. 2000 Characters Maximum.

Curiously, the standard why MBA /Short term goal only is not called an essay, yet clearly it is. It is also the single longest essay in the entire set of IMD questions. THIS QUESTION DOES NOT FOCUS ON YOUR LONG TERM GOALS.  It is about a post-MBA plan and how IMD will help you carry out that plan. The focus should be on your plans and not your motivation for those plans.  Certainly mention the motivation, but conceptualize  this as a very practical question regarding your 5-year plan post-IMD and how IMD figures into that plan. Don't forget to answer "how you will approach your job search?" because this is an important part of your plan. IMD is looking for applicants who can take charge of their own careers and drive them, not people who expect a career services office to simply take care of them. Explain what resources you can leverage to launch your post-IMD career.
">If you are having trouble formulating your plan, you might want to go through a formal analysis of why you need an MBA.

 
You can use my GAP, SWOT, AND ROI TABLE FOR FORMULATING GRADUATE DEGREE GOALS for this purpose (see below). I think Gap, SWOT, and ROI analysis are great ways for understanding what your goals are, why you want a degree, and how you will use it. (Click here for the Businessweek MBA ROI calculator. Click here for a GMAC report on MBA ROI. )

(To best view the following table, click on it. For a word version, please email me at adammarkus@gmail.com)

How to use this table:

Step 1.
Begin by analyzing your "Present Situation." What job(s) have you held? What was/is your functional role(s)? What was/are your responsibilities?

Next, analyze your present strengths and weaknesses for succeeding in your present career. REMEMBER:WHEN YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT YOUR STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESS DON'T ONLY THINK ABOUT WORK, THINK ABOUT OTHER ASPECTS OF YOUR LIFE. In particular, some of your greatest strengths may have been demonstrated outside of work, so make sure you are accounting for them.
Strengths: What are you good at? Where do you add value? What are you praised for? What are you proud of?
Weakness: What are you bad at? What are you criticized for? What do you try to avoid due to your own limitations? What do you fear?

Next
, analyze the environment you work in right now. What opportunities exist for your growth and success? What threats could limit your career growth?

Step 2.
Now, do the same thing in Step 1 for your "Post-Degree" future after you have earned your MBA. IF YOU CANNOT COMPLETE STEP 2, YOU HAVE NOT SUFFICIENTLY PLANNED FOR YOUR FUTURE and therefore you need to do more research and need to think more about it.

Step 3.
If you could complete step 2, than you should see the "Gap" between your present and your future. What skills, knowledge, and other resources do you need to close the gap between your present and future responsibilities, strengths, and opportunities?

Step 4. After completing Step 3, you need to determine how an MBA will add value to you. It is possible that an increased salary as a result of job change will be sufficient "ROI" for the degree to justify itself, but you should show how a degree will allow you to reach your career goals. How will the degree enhance your skills and opportunities and help you overcome your weaknesses and external threats? If you can complete Step 4 than you should be ready to explain what your goals are, why you want a degree, and the relationship between your past and future career, as well as your strengths and weaknesses.

The above table will also help you answer such common interview questions as: Where do you want to work after you finish your degree? Why do you want an MBA (or other degree)? What are you strengths? What are your weaknesses? What are your goals? Thinking about these issues now will help you to develop a fully worked-out strategy for how you will best present yourself both in the application and in an interview.

After going through this formal process, review what you know about IMD again. In your answer to the question, please focus on showing how IMD will help make your post-MBA future objectives a reality.  BOTTOM LINE: Conceptualize this as a business plan with IMD as a partner who will help enable that plan.

Most important achievement


What do you consider to be your single most important achievement and why? 1230 Characters Maximum

This question is not called an essay either, but it is.  Clearly you need to write on something different from the two topics you cover in Essay 1.  See my analysis of HBS Essay 1 as it applies to this question and also to Essay 1.  My analysis of HBS will also help you choose and differentiate between the topics in the this essay and in Essay 1.
 

The 10 Essays

LENGTH
Each essay answer is quite short, just a maximum of 1230 characters with spaces for each required answer. Essay 1 requires two separate answers. Each answer would be a maximum of about 200-300 words each.


Essay 1: Two situations of importance to you
Situation 1
Situation 2
You have 1230 characters for each Situation. On the online application they are treated as separate answers, so I suggest you treat them as separate essays.

I don't necessarily suggest answering this question first due to its open-ended nature. Instead, first determine what topics you will write about for Essays 2 through 5. Essay 1 is what I call a "balance question" because you can use it to make sure that you are emphasizing all of your most compelling personality characteristics, background, and strengths in your application. Given the limited space in Essay 4 to write about strengths, I think it is fine if you briefly mention a strength in Essay 4 that is substantially proven by one of the situations you write about in Essay 1.

While situations of importance to you may not be accomplishments, many applicants will use this essay for that purpose. If you write about accomplishments, please see my analysis of HBS Essay 1 as it would apply here. I think most applicants will consider it to their advantage to have at least one of these situations be an accomplishment. Of course, you will have already written about your "
single most important achievement."
.

Essay 2: Failure to reach objective
Please comment on a situation where you failed to reach an objective and what you learned from it.
INSEAD asks almost the same question, so if you are applying to both, excepting for possible differences in word count, you could use the same topic.

This is a fairly standard failure question. That said, I think it is important to remember that the objective you fail to reach might very well be your own personal objective and not one imposed on you. You might very well succeed from the perspective of others, but fail from your own perspective.

It is critical that you learned something meaningful about yourself. And your learning about yourself should be important, otherwise why tell admissions about it? Therefore the key constraint of this question is that whatever the failure is, you have learned something important from it. While not stated, you may very well find that one way of showing what you learned is to discuss how you applied your lesson to a new situation.

I would, in fact, argue that the heart of any sort of "failure question," whether it is an essay question or an interview is what you learned. Also depending on what your role was, how you reacted is also very important.

The basic components of an answer:
1. Clearly state what the objective was.
2. Clearly state your role.
3. Clearly state your failure.
4. Explain what you learned.

The word count is limited, but, if you can, show how you applied what you learned to a new situation because the application of abstract learning to a new situation is a key indicator of real learning.


Essay 3: Leadership
Describe a situation where you had to demonstrate strong leadership skills. Explain how effective you were and what you learned.
Obviously, given the centrality of leadership to IMD, use your best (or one of your best) leadership story here. This should be a story where you demonstrate your strengths as leader, have a concrete result, and are able to provide IMD with an interpretation of your actions.

I have developed the following grid to help you outline leadership stories. The categories this grid employs may go beyond any particular school's essay requirements. Filling it out completely will help you write about your leadership in a way that will convince admissions of your leadership potential.
CLICK TO ENLARGE. EMAIL me at adammarkus@gmail.com if you want the original excel version.

How to use the grid:
1. Decide on a specific story.
2. Identify the most significant things you did in the situation, these are you action steps.
3. For each action step identify:





  • What skills or qualities you demonstrated to complete this step.
  • The strengths you demonstrated to complete this step.
  • The kind of leadership you demonstrated.
  • What you still need to learn about leadership.
4. Think about the results and identify how they relate to your action steps. So, at minimum, you should be able to state the impact on others and/or yourself.

5. After completing the chart you will see that some aspects of your action steps may be repeated. If there is a total duplication and nothing new is shown, either you need to redefine the action step or you may decide not to focus on it very much.

6. Once you think you have two to four fully worked-out action steps, start writing your essay.

7. Next, start re-writing. Eliminate duplicate points made between action steps. Make choices about what parts of each action to step to highlight. Given that there are usually word limits, you will have to make some decisions about what to include.

Simply providing a description of your actions, is not enough. Think about what it signifies about you. Think about what your actions reveals about your leadership potential. State what you learned.

Finally, thinking and writing about leadership is an important part of preparing for interviews because you can be certain that you will have to talk about leadership. So you might find that the parts of the outline you jettison now will become valuable when you will want to have alternative stories for your IMD interview.

Essay 4: Describe yourself
How do you imagine your superior would describe your strengths and weaknesses to someone who does not know you?
With a question like this I think it is important to understand that you are actually being asked to think about your strengths and weaknesses more objectively than you might otherwise. In particular, you need to judge yourself from the viewpoint of a hypothetical supervisor who is describing you to someone who does not know you.

My suggestion is to think about what your supervisors in the past have mentioned to you as both your strengths and weaknesses. Don't feel obligated to focus on that exclusively, but just make sure that your strengths and weaknesses are ones that your superior could recognize.

Obviously the strengths and weaknesses under consideration are mostly, though not necessarily exclusively, of a professional nature. Given the word count, I suggest focusing on no more than about two strengths and two weaknesses. I would try to give fairly equal consideration to both weaknesses and strengths.

EMBRACE WEAKNESS!
I find that many applicants resist writing about their own weaknesses. Yet, to do so reveals self-awareness and maturity. While I think it is necessary to practice good judgment when writing about weakness, I think it is also important that you provide something beyond the routine.

One standard defensive strategy that many applicants seem drawn to is to write about knowledge areas where they are weak. While this can be OK in some cases, it tends to lack any real depth. One thing to avoid is to discuss a skill that you need for the future, but don't need now as a weakness. It is not a weakness because up till now you have not needed it.

STRENGTHS
Strengths are easier to write about, but do keep in mind that you want to be specific about them. Given the limited space here, you might find it helpful to write about a topic here that is discussed in greater detail in another essay.

IS IT A GOOD STRENGTH OR WEAKNESS?
Some questions to ask yourself:
1. Does the strength demonstrate one's potential for future academic and/or professional success? If so, it is a probably a good topic. If not, why does IMD need to know about it?
2. Is a weakness fixable? If you are writing about a weakness that cannot be improved upon through your program at IMD, why do they need to know about it?
3. If your strength or weakness is not related to leadership, why does IMD need to know about it?

Essay 5: International Exposure
Describe a situation where you successfully worked across cultures and/or nations.

A new question for 2010!

What this is not:  It is not a culture shock question, so chances are if you were thinking you could use your INSEAD culture shock essay here, you probably can't.  If you have absolutely no international experience, it will be impossible to answer this question. However, most everyone has international experience and it need not be outside of your home country: It just needs to involve dealing with a different nation or culture.  The point is that it has to be an accomplishment story involving an international component.  For many applicants to IMD, this will be easy because a significant percentage of their work will be international. Working across cultures or nations, may mean something professional, but if you don't have such a story, think of a successful experience you had that involved more than one culture or nation. For some applicants this essay will be about a major accomplishment, but for others it will simply be about being effective in an international setting.

Essay 6: Differentiators




IMD receives numerous applications per year. Give us four bullet points that clearly differentiate you from this applicant pool.
1230 Characters Maximum
In a Class of 90, there is no room for letting in someone who can't function well and does not have something distinct to contribute. I like this question because it forces applicants to really think about their core selling points.  Clearly, there will be significant overlap with other essays. Think of this as more than an executive summary because really it is a your "elevator pitch" to IMD.  What are the key statements that IMD really needs to know about you that will make them want to invite you for their interview?

Essay 7: Alternatives

If you are not admitted, what alternatives will you consider?
This question is designed to test both your real motivations and your ability to develop a plan for meeting your own professional objectives. Therefore I think it is important to consider it in relation to your answer to"Position sought after graduation" above.
  How will you still work towards your five-year plan without an IMD MBA?

While a successful answer to this question can certainly include the fact that you have already been admitted elsewhere, that would not be a sufficient answer. You would also want to explain why IMD would be a better choice for you than that other school.

Some think about stating they would reapply. If you are not company-sponsored, that certainly is an option. If you are, it is probably not.That said, simply stating that you would reapply is not enough, instead you need to think about how you will move forward to accomplish what you would have tried to accomplish at IMD.

Essay 8: Finance
Please explain how you intend to finance your studies at IMD. What would be your budget?
This should be treated as more of an administrate rather than an evaluative topic. You just need to state your plan for financing your education. Stick to the facts and make sure what you write is easy to understand and will in no way be a source of concern to the admissions committee.

Essay 9: Disability / illness
Do you have a disability or illness that could affect your performance at IMD? If so, please explain.
If you have no disability or illness of significance, you need not answer this one. In that case, just write "Not Applicable" or words to that effect. If you do have a disability or illness, then I suggest taking the time to contact IMD first, so you can get a better idea about how to best answer this question. If some sort of special arrangement would be necessary for you, please contact IMD to make sure that they can provide it.

Essay 10: Additional Information Optional question: Is there any additional information that is critical for the Admissions Committee to know which has not been covered elsewhere in this application?
While I suppose it is possible to answer this question with "No," in most cases I would not recommend doing so.

For some applicants who have to discuss something negative such as a low GPA, the topic for this essay will be clear enough. Just make sure your answer is a clear and believable explanation and not an excuse.

For those who have nothing negative to write about, think about one or two topics that you believe would help admissions to understand you and support your admission. Be careful that you do not pick a trivial topic
.


THE ESSAYS ARE THE EASY PART OF THE IMD APPLICATION PROCESS.
There is no MBA interview that compares to the day of trial that IMD puts potential applicants through.  Reading a report of an IMD interview makes me feel exhausted.  The particular style of group and individual interviewing and observation they do, is truly impressive and totally necessary given their class size and reputation.   The IMD interview eliminates those who will not be able to survive in a very intense program. From what I can gather, IMD appears to interview a very large percentage of those who apply and dings a large percentage of those it interviews. Given the unique nature of the program (Super small size, total focus on leadership, and location), I think it is likely that IMD is getting an extremely high percentage of qualified applicants.






Questions? Write comments, but do not send me emails asking me to advise you on your application strategy unless you are interested in my consulting services. Please see my FAQ regarding the types of questions I will respond to.

For information about my admissions consulting services, please see http://adammarkus.com/

 
Before emailing me questions about your chances for admission or personal profile, please see my post on "Why I don't analyze profiles without consulting with the applicant."
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス


ヨーロッパのトップランキング ビジネススクール カウンセリング コンサルティング 大学院 エッセイMBA留学 スイス

Knewton on "GMAT test day, minute by minute"

In the following post by Knewton's Grad School Verbal Lead, the GMAT test day is broken down minute by minute. Especially for anyone who has not actually sat for the GMAT before, I think the following is quite helpful.  Disclaimer: Knewton is both my content partner and a Linkshare advertising partner on my blog. 
-Adam
アダム

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GMAT test day, minute by minute
Alex Sarlin is the Grad School Verbal Lead at Knewton, where he focuses on GMAT prep.
In reality, test day is not that different from any other day of preparation—test-takers must be attentive, focused, and fully prepared to bring their A-game. But for many test-takers, the term “test day” brings a variety of symptoms: cold sweats, night terrors, the shakes, and so on. Knowing the nitty-gritty of what to expect when you get to the testing center can help relieve some of that unnecessary anxiety. Here’s Knewton’s minute-to-minute breakdown of a typical testing experience.
1. Arrive early, but don’t plan on studying at the testing center. 30 minutes before liftoff.
Show up to the test center 30 minutes before the official time, as the GMAC suggests. Although this may mean waking up even earlier than expected, avoiding any feeling of being rushed is priceless. However, many testing centers don’t allow studying in the waiting room, so don’t plan on getting there early and reviewing notes. Use the time before the test to relax and focus on the task at hand.
2. Locker Room. 10 minutes before liftoff.
After presenting your identification and test reservation, you may be given a key to a locker, into which you must put everything on your person other than your identification itself. This includes pens, paper, books, cell phones, house keys, lucky rabbit’s feet… everything. All you are allowed to bring in is your identification and the locker key itself. Think of this as a cleansing ritual, or a locker room warm-up. Although some centers may be more lax than others, in no circumstances expect to carry anything into the testing room.
3. Entering the Testing Room.2 minutes before liftoff
The testing room will be a room filled with computers. It will be shut off from the rest of the testing center and under constant video monitoring. You may feel like the subject of some strange scientific experiment entering this room, but fear not. No shocks will be administered, and you will be far too wrapped up in your computer screen to notice the cameras or the half-lidded gaze of the proctors. Also note that you will be not only starting the test on a different schedule than other test-takers, but that it is likely that the others in the room may be taking different tests altogether. Whispering or passing notes is neither an option nor a temptation; this is not high school.
4. Tools of the Trade. Seconds before liftoff.
You will be provided with several tools with which to conquer the GMAT. The scratch pad looks and feels like a laminated legal pad; it is lined, yellow and shiny, and you will be provided with a thin black dry-erase upon which to write. These both work well, and you are allowed at any time to raise your hand to get the proctor’s attention if you need replacement pads or pens. You may also be provided with noise-canceling headphones (like those used by jackhammer-using construction workers). These work like a charm, even though the noise you’ll be canceling is the clickity-clacking keyboards of a dozen other test-takers.
5. Liftoff. The argument essay (30 min).
After signing in (perhaps with the proctor’s input), you’re off! You begin with the argument essay, and are given a 30:00 ticking digital clock in the corner of the screen by which to measure your progress. Depending on your comfort with this time period, you may want to outline your essay on the pad before writing, especially noting which examples you expect to use and in what order.
6. Getting Personal. 30-60 minutes in. Issue Essay.
Same deal; you know the drill.
7. Eight is Enough. 60-68 minutes in. Break 1 (8 minutes).
You have the option to take an 8-minute break at this point. Keep in mind that the break starts the second you click “yes,” meaning that once you raise your hand to get the proctor, sign out by using your ID, and leave the room, you have less time than you might think to get back. This is enough time for a bathroom break or a breather, but no more. Up to this point, you have been at the test center for an hour and a half, and not yet seen one verbal or math question. So the first third of test day is all warming up and doing the essays; try to time your caffeine intake accordingly.
8. Test Day Begins. 68-143 minutes. Math  (75 minutes).
Test day begins in earnest. You cannot know which section will come first on the GMAT, but you will have 75 minutes either way. The math section is considered far more difficult to finish in this time period than is the verbal for most test-takers, so plan accordingly (and use timed practice to understand your own timing). The math section will have you using that scratch pad in earnest, and you may want to use it to virtually “eliminate” choices on the verbal section by writing out A, B, C, D and E and crossing out choices as you go. The number of each question (and how many are left) is provided at all times, as is the time.
9. Eight is Enough Part 2: 143 minutes-151 minutes. Break 2 (8 minutes).
Just like Break 1, except it’s likely that you will need this break even more. Take it to get a breather and prepare for the next section. Shift from math to verbal (or vice versa) mentally, with the different timing considerations in your mind.
10. The Home Stretch! 151- 226 minutes. Verbal (75 minutes).
Stay alert! You’ve been at the test center for almost 4 hours at this point, but your concentration and focus is as necessary as ever. Watch those questions count down as you go…
11. Getting Down to Business. Score Reporting Info. 226-234 minutes.
As your reward for finishing the test, you get to decide which schools get your (still unreported) score. Let visions of leafy campuses, whiteboards, and elbow-patched professors fill your mind as you enter the schools you’d like to receive your score reports.
12. Do or Die: Canceling Your Score. 234-236 minutes.
Last step: you have two minutes (with a ticking clock) to decide whether to cancel your score or report it. What’s your final answer? If you decide to report the score, you will immediately be informed of your scores and percentiles on the math and verbal reports. Either way, after four hours, almost half of which did not involve any math or verbal questions, test day has become history. It wasn’t so bad, was it?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure: See my earlier post regarding my Linkshare advertising agreement with Knewton.
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス
GMAT オンライン コース テスト情報 試験対策準備

Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton

Where is the love?

I hope that title got your attention.  The question is actually a reminder.   Fit with a school is all about answering "Where is the love?"  That is to say, your justification for attending a particular MBA program should very much include both justifications based on reason ("I a want to study finance because...") and passion ("I'm excited about the prospect of becoming part of your community because..").   Showing "love" is all about providing a comprehensive explanation for a why a particular school is right for you.

I find that many applicants can naturally express love when it comes to their top choice school(s), but especially when it comes their safety schools, the love starts to fade.  However, it is especially important with safety schools that you need to show love.  They have been jilted so many times before (Hence their low yield) by admits, that they will be sensitive to this.  Especially with schools that have a low rate of acceptance and a low yield (Haas for example), showing the love is critical.    You certainly want to make sure you get into your back-up(s), so take the steps to convince them that they really are your first choice (at least in theory).  Don't think for a moment that it is callous or dishonest to create such an impression because it may very much become the case that your backup becomes the love of your life.


Questions? Write comments, but do not send me emails asking me to advise you on your application strategy unless you are interested in my consulting services. Please see my FAQ regarding the types of questions I will respond to.

For information about my admissions consulting services, please see http://adammarkus.com/

 
Before emailing me questions about your chances for admission or personal profile, please see my post on "Why I don't analyze profiles without consulting with the applicant."
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

ビジネススクール カウンセリング コンサルティング MBA留学
Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton

December 29, 2009

Pushing the submit button

Yes, it is that time of year.  Try, if possible, to push the submit button only after reviewing everything closely and making sure your application is as good as it can reasonably be.  If you know your application is real weak, but think playing the lottery is a good idea, think again.  A wise person knows when something has to give.  If it is a choice between MBA application suicide in round two and submitting something effective in round three, think about not pressing that button yet.
-Adam
アダム

December 25, 2009

Happy Holidays!

Now get back to graduate school application preparation!
Adam

December 21, 2009

Undergraduate Institutions of HBS MBA Students

Comparatively speaking, HBS provides a more transparent approach to admissions data than any other MBA program.  In addition to essentially breaking down the age distribution by revealing the year of undergraduate graduation and providing extensive statistical profiles,  HBS has recently  uploaded the list of all undergraduate institutions that members of the classes of  2009-2011.  This is certainly one of the most interesting lists that HBS has released.  The diversity of institutions represented is great.  Just because your school is not on this list is not a cause for despair, but you should certainly factor that in to how your academic experience is going to be evaluated and you should consider to what extent you will need or want to educate HBS about the value of your undergraduate experience.

Here is the list:

  • Academia de Studii Economice
  • Adam Mickiewicz Univeersity
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität
  • Albright College
  • Altay State Technical University
  • American University of Beirut
  • American University, Cairo
  • Amherst College
  • Anahuac University
  • Anna University
  • Aoyama Gakuin University
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • Arizona State University
  • Ateneo De Manila University
  • Australian National University
  • Azerbaijan State Economic University
  • Babson College
  • Ball State University
  • Bar Ilan University
  • Barnard College
  • Bates College
  • Baylor University
  • Bentley College
  • Bernard Baruch College
  • Berry College
  • Bilkent University
  • Birla Institute of Technology and Science
  • BMS College of Engineering
  • Bocconi University
  • Bogazici University
  • Boston College
  • Boston University
  • Bowdoin College
  • Brandeis University
  • Brigham Young University
  • Brown University
  • Bryn Mawr College
  • Bucknell University
  • Buenos Aires Technical Institute
  • California Institute of Technology
  • California Polytechnic State University
  • California State University
  • Carleton College
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • Catholic University
  • Catholic University, Cordoba
  • Chartered Institute of Management Accountants
  • Ching Hua University
  • Christ College
  • Claremont McKenna College
  • Clarkson University
  • Classe Préparatoire Saint Pierre
  • Clemson University
  • Colby College
  • Colgate University
  • College of Charleston
  • College of the Holy Cross
  • Colorado School of Mines
  • Columbia University
  • Complutense University of Madrid
  • Concordia University
  • Connecticut College
  • Cooper Union
  • Copenhagen Business School
  • Cornell University
  • Creighton University
  • Czech Technical University
  • Dalian University of Technology
  • Dartmouth College
  • Davidson College
  • De Paul University
  • Delaware State University
  • Denison University
  • Dillard University
  • Drexel University
  • Duke University
  • Durham University
  • Eastern Kentucky University
  • Ecole Centrale
  • Ecole de Technologie Superieure
  • Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commeriales
  • Ecole des Mines de Paris
  • Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
  • Ecole Nationale Supérieure EEHT
  • Ecole Polytechnique
  • Ecole Sainte Genevieve
  • Ecole Superieure de Commerce de Paris
  • Emory University
  • Erasmus University
  • Escuela Superior de Administracion y Direccion de Empresas
  • Escuela Superior de Economia y Negocios
  • Escuela Superior de Ingenieros, Universidad de Sevilla
  • ESSEC Graduate School of Management
  • European Business School
  • European University Viadrina
  • Fachhochschule Munich
  • Faculdade Ibmec Sao Paulo
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb
  • Faculty of Economics, University of BL
  • Florida A&M University
  • Florida State University
  • FOM University of Applied Science
  • Fr C Rodrigues Institute of Technology, Mumbai University
  • Franklin & Marshall College
  • Franklin W. Olin College
  • Fudan University
  • Fundacao Armando Alvares Penteado
  • Fundacao Getulio Vargas
  • Georgetown University
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • GIK Institute of Engineering Sciences & Technology
  • Gonville & Caius College
  • Gothenburg School of Business
  • Government Engineering College
  • Grinnell College
  • H.R. College of Commerce & Economics
  • Hampton University
  • Handelshochschule Leipzig
  • Hansraj College
  • Harvard University
  • Hautes Etudes d'Ingénieur
  • Haverford College
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • HEC Paris
  • Helsinki University of Technology
  • Heriot Watt University
  • Hitotsubashi University
  • Hofstra University
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • Howard University
  • Hunter College
  • IBMEC School of Economics and Finance
  • Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Imperial College of Science and Technology
  • Indian Institute of Technology
  • Indian School of Mines
  • Indiana University
  • Institut d'Etudes Politiques
  • Instituto Superior Tecnico
  • Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico (ITAM)
  • Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica
  • Instituto Tecnologico de Buenos Aires
  • Instituto Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM)
  • Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya
  • Iowa State University
  • ISCTE – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
  • Jacobs University
  • Jadavpur University
  • Jiao Tong University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • KAIST
  • Kansas State University
  • Keio University
  • Kettering University
  • Kiev State University
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
  • King's College
  • Koblenz School of Corporate Management
  • Koc University
  • Kochanowski Secondary School
  • Korea University
  • Krivoy Rog Economic Institute
  • Kyiv National University of Economics
  • Kyoto University
  • La Sapienza
  • Lahore University of Management Sciences
  • Laval University
  • Lehigh University
  • Lipetsk State Technical University
  • London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Ludwig-Maximilians University
  • Lycee Carnot
  • Lycee Henri IV – classes préparatoires
  • Lycée Thiers, Sciences Preparatory Classes to Grandes Ecoles
  • Maastricht University
  • Macalester College
  • Macquarie University
  • Marian College of Fond Du Lac
  • Marquette University
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • McGill University
  • McMaster University
  • Mercy College
  • Miami University
  • Michigan State University
  • Michigan Technological University
  • Middle East Technical University
  • Middlebury College
  • Milan Polytechnic
  • Military Engineering Institute
  • Missouri State University
  • Monash University
  • Morehouse College
  • Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
  • Moscow State Institute of International Relations
  • Moscow State University
  • Mount Holyoke College
  • Muskingum College
  • Nankai University
  • Nanyang Technological University
  • National Institute of Technology
  • National Taiwan University
  • National Tsing Hua University
  • National University of Sciences and Technology – College of E&ME
  • National University of Singapore
  • New University of Lisbon
  • New York University
  • North Carolina A&T University
  • North Carolina State University
  • Northeastern University
  • Northwestern University
  • Northwood University
  • Novosibirsk State University
  • Oberlin College
  • Occidental College
  • Odessa National Academy of Law
  • Odessa National I.I. Mechnikov University
  • Ohio State University
  • Oklahoma State University
  • Oregon State University
  • Osmania University
  • Peking University
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Pepperdine University
  • Politecnico Di Torino
  • Pomona College
  • Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina
  • Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
  • Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru
  • Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro
  • Preparatory school – Lycée Kléber
  • Princeton University
  • Principia College
  • Private University of Witten/Herdecke
  • Punjab Engineering College
  • Purdue University
  • Qinghua University
  • Queen's University
  • Radford University
  • Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology
  • Renmin University of China
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • Reutlingen University
  • Reykjavik University
  • Rice University
  • Richmond, the American International University in London
  • Rijksuniversiteit Gent
  • Rio De Janeiro Federal University
  • Rochester Institute of Technology
  • Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
  • Rutgers – The State University
  • Saint Lawrence University
  • Saint Louis University
  • Saint Olaf College
  • Salisbury State University
  • Scripps College
  • Seattle University
  • Seoul National University
  • Shanghai Chiao Tung
  • Shanghai Institute of Foreign Trade
  • Shanghai International Studies University
  • Shanghai Maritime University
  • Shanghai University of Finance & Economics
  • Sichuan University
  • Simon Bolivar University
  • Simon Fraser University
  • Smith College
  • Sogang University
  • Solvay Business School
  • Sophia University
  • Southern Methodist University
  • Southwest University of Finance and Economics, China
  • Spelman College
  • St Stephen's College, Delhi University
  • St. John's College
  • St. John's University
  • St. Mary's College
  • St. Petersburg State University
  • Stanford University
  • State University of New York
  • State University of West Georgia
  • Stockholm School of Economics
  • Stockholm University
  • Sung Kyung Kwan University
  • Supelec
  • Swarthmore College
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology
  • Symbiosis Center for Distance Learning
  • Taylor University
  • Technical University of Berlin
  • Technical University of Delft
  • Technical University of Karlsruhe
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Temple University
  • Tennessee State University
  • Texas A&M University
  • Texas Christian University
  • Texas Tech University
  • Thammasat University
  • Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology
  • The College of William and Mary
  • The George Washington University
  • Touro College, Lander College for Men
  • Trinity College
  • Tsinghua University
  • Tufts University
  • Tulane University
  • Unicamp-Brazil
  • Union College
  • United States Air Force Academy
  • United States Coast Guard Academy
  • United States Military Academy
  • United States Naval Academy
  • Universidad Adolfo Ibanez
  • Universidad de Lima
  • Universidad de Montevideo
  • Universidad de Navarra
  • Universidad Iberoamericana
  • Universidad Metropolitana
  • Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
  • Universidad Panamericana
  • Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
  • Universidad Pontificia de Comillas
  • Universidad Torcuato Di Tella
  • Universidade Catolica Portuguesa
  • Universidade de Sao Paulo
  • Universidade do Porto
  • Università Carlo Cattaneo
  • Università del Piemonte Orientale
  • Universitat Politecnica Catalunya
  • Universitat Rovira i Virgili
  • Universite de Liege
  • Universite Libre de Bruxelles
  • Université Paris I – Panthéon Sorbonne
  • Université Paris X Nanterre
  • University College, Dublin
  • University of Alabama
  • University of Alberta
  • University of Amsterdam
  • University of Arizona
  • University of Arkansas
  • University of Auckland
  • University of Bath
  • University of Birmingham
  • University of Bristol
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Calgary
  • University of California, Berkeley
  • University of California, Davis
  • University of California, Irvine
  • University of California, Los Angeles
  • University of California, San Diego
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
  • University of Cambridge
  • University of Cape Town
  • University of Chicago
  • University of Chile
  • University of Cincinnati
  • University of Colorado
  • University of Cooperative Education Stuttgart
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Costa Rica
  • University of Dayton
  • University of Delaware
  • University of Delhi
  • University of Deusto
  • University of Dublin, Trinity College
  • University of Economics, Prague
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
  • University of Florida
  • University of Georgia
  • University of Hawaii
  • University of Heidelberg
  • University of Houston
  • University of Illinois
  • University of Innsbruck
  • University of International Business and Economics, Beijing
  • University of Iowa
  • University of Johannesburg
  • University of Kansas
  • University of Karachi, Institute of Business Administration
  • University of Kentucky
  • University of London
  • University of London
  • University of Louisville
  • University of Madras
  • University of Maine
  • University of Manchester
  • University of Manitoba
  • University of Mannheim
  • University of Maryland
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Miami
  • University of Michigan
  • University of Minnesota
  • University of Mississippi
  • University of Missouri
  • University of Montana
  • University of Mumbai
  • University of Navarra
  • University of Nebraska
  • University of New Brunswick
  • University of New Mexico
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Notre Dame
  • University of Oklahoma
  • University of Oregon
  • University of Oslo
  • University of Oviedo
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Pavia
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Puget Sound
  • University of Queensland
  • University of Redlands
  • University of Richmond
  • University of Rome
  • University of San Andres
  • University of San Diego
  • University of Southern California
  • University of St. Andrews
  • University of St. Gallen
  • University of Sydney
  • University of Tennessee
  • University of Texas
  • University of Texas, El Paso
  • University of the Philippines
  • University of the West Indies
  • University of Tokyo
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Utah
  • University of Victoria
  • University of Vienna
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Warsaw
  • University of Warwick
  • University of Washington
  • University of Waterloo
  • University of Western Australia
  • University of Western Ontario
  • University of Wisconsin
  • University of Zurich
  • Utrecht University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Vassar College
  • Vienna School of Economics and Business Administration
  • Virginia Military Institute
  • Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Wabash College
  • Wake Forest University
  • Warsaw School of Economics
  • Waseda University
  • Washington & Lee University
  • Washington University
  • Weber State University
  • Wellesley College
  • Wesleyan University
  • West Virginia University
  • Wheaton College
  • William Jewell College
  • Williams College
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute
  • Yale University
  • Yonsei University
  • York University
  • Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

MBA留学

Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton

December 18, 2009

Knewton: GMAT or GRE?

While I have previously discussed the issue below and personally take a very neutral position on whether one should take the GMAT or GRE, Jose Ferreira, the Founder and CEO of Knewton takes a very anti-GRE position. One of the primary reasons I was initially attracted to having Knewton  both advertise and provide GMAT content for my blog was because of Jose, who is certainly one of the top test prep guys on the planet.  Given Jose's expertise with both the GMAT and GRE, his comments below are really worth considering. For the record, I have yet to have done admissions consulting with a single MBA applicant who took the GRE, so I have absolutely no personal sense of what kind of admissions outcomes taking the GRE leads to.

-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GMAT OR GRE

You may have heard that some business schools (Harvard, MIT, NYU, Stanford, Virginia, Yale, U Penn, and Berkeley) have started accepting GRE scores in place of GMAT scores. And you may be thinking: “Awesome! I hear the GRE is easier. I’m taking that!”
 
After all—there’s no Data Sufficiency on the GRE. Sounds great, right?
The problem is: There’s no Data Sufficiency on the GRE.

The GMAT has been designed and perfected for business school students. GMAT questions mirror the tasks you will perform every day in business school. Reading Comprehension—because you’ll be reading 50 -100 pages in case studies every day. And Data Sufficiency—because you’ll be skimming each case’s exhibits and financials to determine which numbers are key to cracking the case and which are irrelevant. What about Critical Reasoning? Well, every day in class you will comment on other students’ arguments. And they will comment on yours, sometimes in pretty snarky ways. So you need some facility in arguments, if only to protect yourself from that loudmouth ex-banker in the Skydeck.

In fact, the GMAT is a great test. By that I don’t mean that it will bring peace to the world, or spiritual enlightenment, or that a good time will be had by all. I mean it’s extremely well-constructed, with very high scoring consistency. In short, the GMAT does an excellent job of testing the skills you need to excel in business school.

In contrast, the GRE General Test is, well, general. It is designed to provide a sense of the fitness of a student for graduate-level work, whether one is interested in pursuing a PhD in English or a Masters in Psych. But the aptitudes needed to succeed in one discipline are very different from those of other disciplines, and no single test can measure them all well. Success in business, and success in business school, requires very specific skills that the GRE measures poorly, and the GMAT measures very well.
Furthermore, the GRE has been a rather troubled test. (ETS might claim that I’m the one who caused their troubles; in fact, I merely shed light on them.) In the 1990s, I developed a strategy for one question type called Pattern Identification that was so devastating that ETS had to discard hundreds of thousands of printed test booklets, admitting that I “broke the code, so we are removing the questions from the test.” Later on, I reverse-engineered the security protocols and scoring algorithm of the early GRE computerized test, forcing them to pull the exam for months to fix problems I uncovered. They sued us, and took to calling me the “antichrist.” (Umm, do I at least get Connie Nielsen with that?) Later still, they had serious scoring problems with the GRE analytical section, and consequently did away with that section entirely.

So then why do any business schools accept the GRE? Ok, well for one thing the GRE is slowly but surely getting better, and it’s about to be significantly revised so it will probably improve still further. But mostly, it’s about access, especially internationally. The GMAT isn’t available in as many locations, especially overseas. So business schools figure, “Hey, if we accept the GRE, we’ll find some great candidates who might not have been able to apply to business school, or who might add an MBA application or two along with their Masters applications.”

Bottom line: if you can take the GMAT, you should. The GMAT tests skills specific to business school. While admissions officers at schools accepting the GRE will accept a GRE score in lieu of a GMAT score, they doesn’t mean that they’ll will trust GRE scores.  And if you give them a GRE score when it’s clear you could just as easily have taken the GMAT, it could hurt your application.

Besides, Data Sufficiency is fun! Well, here at Knewton we think it’s fun. (Though we also think puns about transfinite cardinality are hilarious.) More importantly for you, Data Sufficiency is equally hard for everybody. It is also highly coachable, and Knewton’s Test Experts have developed the most powerful Data Sufficiency strategies there are. Stay tuned and maybe I’ll blog about them…
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 If you have any comments on this post, please leave comments, do not email Adam. 
Disclosure: See my earlier post regarding my Linkshare advertising agreement with Knewton.


MBA留学 GMAT オンライン コース テスト情報 試験対策準備

Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton

Wailisted in Round 1?

If you were waitlisted for B-School in Round 1, I suggest taking a look at a post I wrote earlier this year, "Waitlisted, Now what?" In addition, to what I have written there, I would just add that a waitlist is an indication that you are basically doing many things right, but might be doing something wrong.   What that means for someone waitlisted in R1 is that it is that they should try and determine what specifically was weak and try to mitigate for subsequent applications. For example, if you were waitlisted after an invitation only interview, assume that the interview might have been part of the reason. Just like a R1 ding (see my prior post), an R1 waitlist should be looked at as an opportunity to reconsider your overall MBA admissions strategy and readjust.


Questions? Write comments, but do not send me emails asking me to advise you on your application strategy unless you are interested in my consulting services. Please see my FAQ regarding the types of questions I will respond to.

For information about my admissions consulting services, please see http://adammarkus.com/

 
Before emailing me questions about your chances for admission or personal profile, please see my post on "Why I don't analyze profiles without consulting with the applicant."
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

ビジネススクール カウンセリング コンサルティング MBA留学


Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton

December 16, 2009

MBA First Round Blues: Top Ten Things To Consider Now

Well, we are in the midst of first round results for top MBA programs, so I thought it would be a good time to discuss what to do if your R1 efforts don't seem to be working. Of course, sometimes, the issue might simply be that you are applying to reach schools in R1 and that you will have much better results in R2.  Still I think it is worth carefully evaluating what if anything you can do to get a better outcome in R2 (and maybe R3 and R4!).  I have written about this subject previously ("MBA First Round Blues: Learn from Failure"), but I thought it would be good to look at the issue again.  While I am also considering the whole issue of "failure," my remarks below are not limited to that.

  
Top Ten List of Things to Consider if R1 is Not Working For You

#1 CHANGE SOMETHING!
Whatever you have done so far is not working. It might be your essays, it might be your school selection, it might be your interview skills, it might be your test scores, it might be the way you fill out applications,  and/or the people you are getting admissions advice from,  but whatever you are doing now, it is not achieving the desired outcome.   If you are working with an admissions consultant, ask them for their perspective on this. 

Last year, one of my clients applied with a particular set of goals that I had initial concerns about, but the client was passionate about them.  While he/she was invited for an interview at a top school, he/she was ultimately dinged from the two places he/she applied in R1. I wrote a long memo suggesting a  different approach to my client's career goals that I had initially thought was more tenable.  The client changed his/her goals and subsequently received multiple offers of admission in R2.  The client also took interview practice more seriously in R2. Those changes were critical to achieving a better outcome.

I am not suggesting changing everything, but chances are pretty good that something needs to change if you are to generate better results with future applications.
 
#2 LOOK AGAIN AT YOUR SCHOOL SELECTION
Depending on the difficulty of admission and number of institutions you have applied to, look again at your school selection. Obviously if you were dinged from HBS, Haas, and Stanford in R1, you can certain of one thing: Anywhere else you apply is easier to get into.  The difference between schools with a 7%-12% chance of admission and those with a 15%-20% chance is really huge. Think about seriously about the admissions numbers (acceptance rate, yield, test scores averages and 80% ranges, average age of admitted applicants, number of years of work experience, and GPA)  for the schools you have applied to and consider deeply how you measure up.  Many people are naturally resistant to looking at these things objectively, but if your numbers and the numbers from  the schools that rejected you are consistently incompatible, you need to really consider applying to places where your numbers will not hurt you and/or help you. You might also consider sitting for the GMAT or TOEFL again if those numbers are not working for you.  I don't recommend applying to places where you will not be happy because of low RO1, but I mean finding additional schools where you are likely to have a better shot than the ones that rejected you.

For company-sponsored applicants or anyone else who must obtain admission for Fall 2010 or Winter 2011, I strongly recommend making sure that you have sufficient safety built into your school selection.  

#3 THINK ABOUT THE ADVICE YOU HAVE RECEIVED SO FAR
Every year I start working with clients after they have received R1 (and also R2 and R3 and R4!) dings.  Sometimes the problem is that the applicant just has not been receiving the right kind of advice. Getting a second opinion from another admissions consultant, a trusted mentor, or someone else whose views you have not yet obtained, can really result in significant changes in outcome.   In my case, I offer both reapplication and second opinion counseling services for this purpose.   For more about obtaining advice form other people, please see this earlier post.


#4 CONSIDER TAKING GMAT AND/OR TOEFL AGAIN
GMAC allows applicants to take the GMAT five times in any 12-month period.  Unless you have maxed yourself out, consider whether you need to take it again.  In general, if your score is 700 or over I don't generally advise it, but if your GPA is real low, you might want to.

I know some people think there is a problem taking the GMAT five times, but I am not one of those people.  I have had a number of clients admitted to HBS, Stanford, Wharton, Chicago, INSEAD, LBS, Haas, Kellogg, etc. who had to take the test five times (or more if over more than 12 months).  Given that schools often tell both those who are waitlisted and reapplicants to take these tests again,  I can see no problem with it.  Clearly it is pain to sit for a test again, but if you know that your scores are not getting you results, it is time to revisit this issue.  My blog's sole advertiser, Knewton, guarantees a 50 point GMAT score increase or a refund, so you might want to consider taking their course. 

With TOEFL, taking it multiple times is not a problem.  If you are having significant problems with a particular section and the test prep methods you have been using so far have not worked, consider changing them.   For those experiencing difficulty with the Speaking Section, my suggestion is to find a teacher who really knows how to teach speaking. From what I have been able to observe, test prep instructors without formal English teaching experience expertise are significantly less likely to be able to help you with the Speaking Section.  The best TOEFL Speaking teacher I know in Tokyo (A friend of mine who prefers that I not mention him here by name because he can't handle more students than he gets from word-of-mouth.) has graduate level training in phonology.

Whether you need to take another  GMAT  or TOEFL test prep course or just study intensively on your own, if whatever test prep. methods you have been so far are not generating the results you need, consider making a change.  After working with hundreds of applicants over the years, the only thing I am certain of is that people learn in different ways.  See a much earlier post on this issue.
 
#5 QUALITY AND TIME MANAGEMENT
Frankly, my worst experiences as a admissions consultant all involve clients trying to apply with hastily written weak content.  While performing emergency room surgery is one part of my job, I know that there is a real difference between what is acceptable at the last minute and what is acceptable a week (or a month)  before the deadline.  If you are constantly submitting at the last possible minute and are continuously in crisis mode, your application content may display a high level of energy, but also possibly lots of errors and lack of clear thinking.  Part of an effective writing process is taking the time to reflect on what you have.  Such moments of careful deliberation can really result in significant improvements in overall application content.  More practically, rush jobs are inherently error prone.  If you think you are setting yourself up for more of the same in R2, consider applying to a small number of schools.  R3 is often viable, so don't rule it out if it will give you breathing room to focus more on the schools you really want to go to.

#6 YOUR ESSAYS AND RESUME
If R1 is not working out,  clearly you need to focus on making sure that your essays and resume are doing what they need to do. In addition to #3 above,  see my earlier post on reapplication.

#7 YOUR APPLICATION FORMS
Application forms are important.  Take them seriously.  The schools don't ask all these questions so that you can write some hastily composed answer.  For more about the application form, see my only post on the subject.  I know filling out forms is boring, but it is necessary.  This is is one of the easiest things to improve upon.  There is such a huge variation in the amount of information that applications ask for, that you really need to be aware of the differences.  Some applications, like HBS, don't give very much space to write anything (That is why a two-page resume at HBS is often a very good idea.), so making best possible use of the space you do have is critical.  Other applications, like Wharton's, give a significant of space to provide detailed answers. Take advantage of that space.  

#8 INTERVIEW SKILLS
Dinged after an invitation-only interview?  Chances are pretty good that you need to be focusing on improving your interview skills.  For more about how to proceed, see here. Practice with significant feedback can make a significant difference in the ultimate outcome. 

#9 YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendations really are a critical part of the application process. If you are not getting good R1 results, you might want to closely revisit this issue.   If you have not done so, try to review the content of your recommendations. If possible, show the recommendations to your admissions consultant or whoever else can give you a second opinion. Consider changing one or more of your recommenders. Here are some questions to ask yourself:
-Do my recommenders really know me well enough to tell convincing stories about me?
-Are my recommenders providing detailed examples or just mere generalities in their recommendations?  You want the former.
- Is there total content overlap between what my recommenders are writing about because they both have had similiar experiences with me?
-If you had to write your own recommendations, ask yourself whether admissions could easily see that was the case.  If so, you have a problem that needs to be addressed.  If you have to forge a recommendation, be a good forger. I am not suggesting that one forge recommendations, but I also know that such situations are far too common.
-Did you select the kind of recommenders that a particular school is looking for.  There are some differences to be aware of. While all schools want a supervisor, the requirements for additional recommenders really varies from school to school. For instance, Stanford wants a peer recomendation, while HBS does not.   Make sure you are selecting recommenders that fit each school you apply to.
-If you could not get an immediate supervisor, did you provide an explanation in the application?  All applications have an optional essay or additional information section for explaining this, so do so.

#10 WHEN TO APPLY
If R1 is not working for you, consider when you should make future applications.  For many, this will be second round, but for some, it might be better to wait for R3 or R4 or until R1 next year.  My suggestion is to do some scenario planning in order to closely consider your timing for entry into school.  I have worked with a number of clients who realized that they really needed another year to apply because they were not ready.  Negative R1 results can be an indicator that you are really rushing things.  If you control your application timing, apply when it is to your maximum advantage.


CONCLUSION
 I hope the above is helpful.  Best of luck with your future results!

Questions? Write comments, but do not send me emails asking me to advise you on your application strategy unless you are interested in my consulting services. Please see my FAQ regarding the types of questions I will respond to.

For information about my admissions consulting services, please see http://adammarkus.com/

 
Before emailing me questions about your chances for admission or personal profile, please see my post on "Why I don't analyze profiles without consulting with the applicant."
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

ビジネススクール カウンセリング コンサルティング MBA留学

December 02, 2009

Q&A with Knewton's Director of Test Prep

As I mentioned in my last post of November, I will be having GMAT content from my Linkshare advertising partner,  Knewton, Inc., on my blog.   What made me decide to partner with them was the strength of their test development team and the price and quality of their approach to test preparation.  I was also impressed that they were willing to offer a 50 point or your money-back guarantee.  To learn more about what they do, I conducted a Q&A with Chris Rosenbaum, Director of Test Prep of Knewton, Inc.

Adam: Tell me about what makes Knewton different from other GMAT test preparation services.


Chris: Knewton is different for two reasons: the technology of our platform, and the quality of our teachers. By delivering our classes online, we can offer students a customized, flexible learning experience focused on their educational needs. Because we’re not operating physical tutoring centers, we don’t have the same constraints that some of the larger companies do. This allows us to drive down the price of test prep. We can also focus our resources on hiring a small, elite group of the best teachers in the business. The beauty of the internet is that people can get access to our teachers and curricula, regardless of where they live or what their schedule is—at the best price, $690.

Adam: Who are the people behind Knewton?
Chris: Knewton CEO Jose Ferreira was an executive at the nation's largest test prep firm, where he led a company-wide effort to re-engineer its courses. Now he has designed Knewton from the ground up to include every feature he was unable to include in traditional bricks and mortar courses. Jose has personally designed Knewton's test prep curriculum, and has cooked up all-new strategies students won't find anywhere else. Catch him in action; he still teaches classes for each test. Jose "broke the code" on the GRE exam by inventing a foolproof strategy for one question type. ETS took the extraordinary step of removing the question type from its exams, saying that Jose "broke the code and published it, so we are removing the questions from the test." It is the only time ETS has ever removed a section from one of its exams due to a test-taking strategy.
David Kuntz has been involved in every aspect of the large-scale educational assessment business over the span of a twenty-year career, holding senior positions at both LSAC and ETS. Among many other activities, he created the first automated test assembly algorithm and system for the current LSAT, the first web-based computer-adaptive test delivery system, the first online AP practice program using real AP graders, and the first large-scale web-based portfolio scoring and management system.

Adam: How good are your test questions? Do they really duplicate the test?

Chris: Our GMAT course gives students access to more than 3400 practice problems, all designed to mirror what they will see on test day. The course includes five practice GMATs built by the people who literally developed the actual test. We don’t think you’ll find a better simulation of the GMAT anywhere.

Adam: Tell me about your online live instructional component.

Chris: Our live video classes are delivered live online via video, with slides and examples appearing onscreen. The teachers have dozens of practice questions at their disposal that they can drag and drop into the lesson in real time. The teachers receive instantaneous data on how students are doing and the conceptual errors they’re making, and can adapt accordingly.
Students can interface via “chat” at any time during class and get immediate responses from the teaching assistants. If the question is relevant to the entire class, the assistant passes it along to the teacher. Students can also send in questions for immediate answers during daily office hours, or at any time if they don’t mind a slight time delay for the answer. All lessons are instantly archived with digital-video-recorder controls for students to replay, pause, fast-forward, or rewind. Students can return and review archived video lessons on demand.

Adam: What differentiates your teaching methods from those of your competitors?

Chris: Aside from the fact of the online platform, we use sophisticated technological tools to optimize our students’ learning experience. Our online curricula include hundreds of concept tags that help us track progress at a very granular level. We're able to tell students with certainty that they're in full command of the fact that all radii in the same circle are equal, but that they need more strategies for 3-4-5 right triangles.
We also offer the single best Money-Back Guarantee in the business. It's very simple. Attend class, complete your homework, take our practice tests. If your score still doesn't improve by at least 50 points, you get a full refund. No questions asked.

Adam: How good are your teachers?

Chris: Without bragging too much, we can safely say that our teachers are the best. They’ve graduated from the top schools, they’ve earned the top scores, they’ve got the most experience, and they demonstrate a heartfelt passion for learning.
Other prep companies give you one, often unproven, teacher. Knewton’s classes are taught by teams of test prep professionals. The lead instructor guides the class from in front of the camera, while a dynamic team of teaching assistants answers all your questions in real-time. This system is unique to Knewton, and it provides the best individual instruction an online course can offer.

Adam: What sort of outcome should a typical Knewton student expect from your service?

Chris: We guarantee a 50-point increase in our students' GMAT scores. If a student’s score does not go up 50 points, he or she will get a full refund. Several of our students have earned much bigger gains than that. One student wrote in to tell us he went from a 480 to a 700 on the GMAT. Another went from a 700 to a 770.  I don’t want to overstate the importance of what we do, but these are life-changing events in terms of future earning potential. We are able to make these guarantees because we believe what we offer students—world-class teachers, top-notch content, and adaptive learning technology—far surpasses what they will get from any other course.

Adam: For someone who has already taken a GMAT course with one of your competitors, but is not yet satisfied with his or her score, what can you offer?

Chris: Our approach is unconventional, and we think we have a substantial edge over our more traditional competitors. If you’re curious but uncertain, we recommend taking our free trial so you can experience our method for yourself.

----------------------------------------------------------
I want to thank Chris for taking the time to answer my questions. Disclosure: See my earlier post regarding my Linkshare advertising agreement with Knewton.
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス
GMAT オンライン コース テスト情報 試験対策準備

Knewton_text_button_120x90_GMATbutton