Go to a better blog!


You can find a better version of my blog at http://www.adammarkus.com/blog/.

Be sure to read my Key Posts on the admissions process. Topics include essay analysis, resumes, recommendations, rankings, and more.
Showing posts with label LLM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LLM. Show all posts

April 22, 2016

Some brief pointers for editing MBA and other graduate school application essays

 Chances are extremely high that when you initially write any application essay and even when you have a good working version of it going, it is likely to be over the word count.  If it is not over the word count, especially at the initial stage that itself is actually a problem.  In another blog post, I will explain why writing to the word count initially is a very bad idea.  In this post, I will assume that you have a good working version of your essay, but it is just too long. 

Here are some suggestions for editing statement of purposes, Why MBA and why this school, leadership/teamwork/values questions, and personal statements down to word or page count: 

1. Is there anything in the essay that repeats what is said in the other essays? If so, you can probably cut it out.  For applications that involve multiple essays or essay-like application form content, part of your job is to fully leverage the entire application. Hence don’t repeat information that can be easily found elsewhere unless it is really useful to do so. You may be using the same data points (facts about yourself) or experiences in multiple parts of the application, but you should be doing so to maximize the value of that information, which is rarely achieved through mere repetition.  With each part of the application, figure out what really needs to be communicated there and look at the application as a whole to make decisions about how to divide your experiences effectively.

2. Do you find yourself needing to explain too much context about your background? If so, consider whether any of it can be explained in the application’s optional essay. If that does not solve the word count issue, consider whether the problem is that you are approaching the story from the wrong angle. Often the problem with context heavy essays is that they don’t tell a story from the right starting point.  In general, defining the right starting point and building content into an action-focused narrative can help.  I know this sounds abstract, but looking at the starting-point often helps clients reframe their stories for both great impact and for purposes of word count.

3. Do you find yourself extensively name dropping? “I met with Anand Kumar (Class of 2006), Sally Johnson (Class of 2009), Taro Suzuki (Class of 2010), Anat Weinstein (Class of 2011), Mohammad Efendi (Class of 2012), and Tom Lee (Class of 2013)…” (Note all these names were made up and any relationship to actual people alumni is merely coincidental). If you do, consider cutting or summarizing it. Also, consider whether such lists can be included in an optional essay. Some schools have a place for including who you met with from the school, so it is not necessary to repeat that in the essay.  On the other, if you are writing a Ph.D. or LL.M. statement of purpose and you want to work with Professor Mada Sukram, you should mention him. In other words, name drop only if doing so is key to argument you are making about why you want to attend a particular program.

4. Do a paragraph by paragraph and then a sentence by sentence search for redundancy. When a client asks for my help in cutting words, which is typically for the last draft, I look for redundancy.

5. Now the really hard part. You have a tight text and it is still over the word count. You have cut something “important.” Prioritize your content and eliminate low priority items. Killing good content is never fun, but sometimes is simply necessary.

Happy Editing!


-Adam Markus
I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.

June 08, 2013

Harvard Law School LL.M. Program Deadlines for September 2014

Harvard Law School has announced the LL.M. Program deadlines:
“For the LL.M. class beginning in September 2014, the application deadline is December 1, 2013. (We strongly encourage all application materials be submitted by November 15, 2013.)”

The application form has not been updated yet, but based on the deadline and materials page, it appears that nothing will likely change from last year. I’ll keep checking till the open the application for 2014 and update my HLS application essay post if needed, but applicants looking to start early should  review that post now.


-Adam Markus
I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.

January 14, 2013

A guide to my resources for reapplicants

I wanted to let readers to my blog know about my resources for reapplicants. I think the best place to start is my June 2010 Reapplication for Success Webinar Transcript and Slides.  Also see MBA Reapplication: Why were you dinged? Now what?
For a more introspective take on rejection and recovery, please see The Warren Buffett Club: Thoughts on MBA Rejection.

I love working with reapplicants because they approach the admissions process with a level of commitment, realism, and focus that only the best first-time applicants can match.  Failure is a harsh teacher, but for intelligent people, a great one. For fall 2011, my reapplicant clients obtained admission at HBS, Stanford GSB, Haas, Chicago Booth, INSEAD and Columbia University Law School LL.M as well as number of other programs.

When a client comes to me for reapplication, I typically review one or more their applications and the use that as basis for developing a new set of winning strategies. Most reapplicants are coming to me for the first time, though I have certainly worked with an existing clients who come to me for reapplication after an initial effort has not succeeded. I customize my reapplication service to meet a meet client’s specific needs as I offer reapplication counseling as part of both a one-time service and as part of comprehensive counseling.


-Adam Markus
I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.

September 06, 2012

Harvard Law School LL.M. Essay Questions for Fall 2013

Harvard Law School has "updated" their Master of Law application page for Fall 2010 admission, so I am updating my post Harvard LL.M. program as well.  Actually the application has not changed significantly for years and this is my first major update in about four years. The deadlines: For the LL.M. class beginning in September 2013, the application deadline is December 1, 2012. (We strongly encourage all application materials be delivered by November 15, 2012.)

While almost all my clients are applying to MBA programs,  I have extensive past experience working with applicants applying to LL.M. programs, but generally only work with a small number of applicants per year. For Fall 2012 admission, I worked with 5 clients with 1 accepted at HLS, another accepted at Yale,  2 each admitted to Columbia and NYU, three admitted to Georgetown, and one each to Chicago Cornell, Berkeley and UCLA. For Fall 2011, I worked with only 1 LL.M. client who applied only to Columbia and was admitted. I worked with no LL.M. applicants for Fall 2010. For Fall 2009 admission, I worked with three LL.M. clients, two of whom were admitted to Harvard. You can find their results here.  For me, working with very high caliber LL.M. clients is quite interesting.  Before establishing my own consulting service in 2007, about 30% of my clients between 2001-2006 were LL.M. applicants, but these days, it is a rather limited aspect of my work.  


WHY SHOULD CARE ABOUT HLS EVEN IF YOU DON'T APPLY THERE

I think everyone who applies to top LL.M. programs should think about the Harvard Law School essay questions even if they don't intend to apply to Harvard: 

1. Harvard Law School is the top general LL.M. program. Yale and Stanford are harder to get into, but they are small specialized programs. Harvard has the best name brand reputation of any American university in the world and so does its law school.


2. Not a single one of the LL.M. admits to Harvard I worked with or know about ever rejected it to attend Columbia, Chicago, or other top general LL.M. programs.

3. For applicants who apply to Harvard, it is the hardest application they will likely have to complete. The only other exception might be UC Berkeley because of the need to have a very detailed plan of study, but that is arguable and highly variable.

4. Most importantly, those who apply to Harvard are also applying to the other top programs and many will most likely be utilizing their Harvard content to prepare essays for other schools. The rigorous analytical and legal thinking that makes for great Harvard essays will thus impact not only their chances for admissions at other schools, but all other applicants' chances as well.

5. Therefore even if you don't apply to Harvard's LL.M. you need to apply the same level of intellectual rigor to your essays that a successful Harvard admit would be applying to his or her essays. Since you are competing with those who apply to Harvard, you need to write essays at the same level as required by Harvard.


In summary, Harvard has a more difficult set of essay questions than other LL.M. programs ask and most who apply to Harvard will be utilizing their content for other schools. So, even if you don't apply to Harvard, you should be aware of what some of your strongest competition will be doing. Harvard has four essay questions (Taken from the online application) and gives a total of 1900 words.


The Personal Statement questions (taken from the online application):


Please read parts a. and b. below carefully and write an essay addressing both questions, with part a. constituting at least half of the total length. Footnotes do not count towards the overall word limit as long as they are limited to providing sources and citations. Your entire statement should be no more than 1,500 words—anything exceeding the word limit will be disallowed. Please type or word-process your statement, with your full name on the top of each page and your signature at the end, and attach it to your application.
  1. Briefly describe either an important issue in your field of interest or a current legal problem facing a particular country, region, or the world, and then propose a theoretical framework or a legal analysis or strategy to address this issue.
  2. Please tell us something about yourself—in particular, why you wish to pursue an LL.M. degree at Harvard and how doing so connects with what you have done in the past and what you plan to do in the future.
Important: Your personal statement must address the above questions specifically, and must be solely the product of your own efforts. We reserve the right to disqualify a statement written by, or with the help of, someone other than the applicant. 
Note: There is a word limit of 1,500 words; please provide a word count at the end of your essay. Please be sure to type or word-process your statement in 12-point font, with at least one-inch (2.5 cm.) margins on each side.

Now while (a) and (b) are the main questions, there are actually two other "essay" questions (taken from the online application):

Please do NOT use ALL CAPS when completing your form.
13. ACADEMIC INTERESTS
Please indicate at least two areas of your academic interests by selecting from the options below (a) a general category and (b) within that category, a specific topic.
Interest 1:
Category: Topic: 
Find Topics | Clear Topic
Interest 2:
Category: Topic: 
Find Topics | Clear Topic
Interest 3:
Category: Topic: 
Find Topics | Clear Topic
Please tell us why you are interested in these areas and how they relate to your career goals. (Note: Please limit your response to no more than 1500 characters.)


14. CAREER PLANS
What are your career plans after you complete your graduate law studies?
(Please choose one option from each box)
Year 1-3
Year 4-6
Year 7 and beyond
Please elaborate on your plans. In which country (or countries) do you intend to pursue your career?
(Note: Please limit your response to no more than 1500 characters.)


Clearly no applicant should duplicate the content they write in essay (b) and in these two shorter questions, yet I believe many applicants do because they treat these two shorter questions as simply application questions and not essay questions. If you think of them as essay questions, you see that, in fact, Harvard gives approximately 2000 words maximum to each LL.M. applicant. This is more than you are likely to write for any law school with the possible exception of schools that don't specify essay length.


Is This One Essay or Two?
Since the two questions are actually divided and you need to have at least 750 words for (a), I have always advised my clients to write each as a separate essay and not a single essay. While the instructions don't absolutely specify that, it would surely make it easier to determine if part a. is at least 750 words if the two parts are separated.  Of course, there should be a connection between the two parts in as much as what you are interested in (a) should relate to what you discuss in (b) as well in terms of your academic interests and career plans.

Now let's analyze the questions:

(a)Briefly describe either an important issue in your field of interest or a current legal problem facing a particular country, region, or the world, and then propose a theoretical framework or a legal analysis or strategy to address this issue.
Question (a) is what makes Harvard's essay different from most other LL.M. applications. It is a real test of your analytical and legal thinking. It is also test of your ability to communicate something important in 750-1000 words. You will probably need at least 500 for (b) and (a) must be at least 750 words long. From my experience the most effective way to write (a) is to:

1. Identify a legal issue that you know really well and can provide a nuanced perspective on. Ideally it should also relate to what you intend to study at Harvard, but at minimum should be a reflection of your best legal thinking.

2. Write a long first draft, say 1000-2000 words.


3. Expect to go through at least four more drafts before it is close to being finished.


4. Show it to a lawyer or other legal expert who can assess whether what you say is actually accurate and impressive. With my clients, I always tell them to do this. Even if I am very familiar with the legal issue my client is analyzing, I ask them to try to get expert advice. If expert advice is not available, find the next best thing, a fellow legal practitioner whose opinion you trust.


5. If you use an admissions consultant, you should ask him or her to assess this essay within the context of your entire application and in comparison to other applicants who were admitted to Harvard. If you are interested in learning more about my services, please see my website.



(b)Please tell us something about yourself—in particular, why you wish to pursue an LL.M. degree at Harvard and how doing so connects with what you have done in the past and what you plan to do in the future.


This is actually a standard question though somewhat different from the standard catchall questions that most other schools ask. The real task is to think what you don't need to include here, which requires looking at the next two essays first, so we will come back to this question.

Academic interests
For most other schools, this would be a standard part of the main question, but Harvard does it a little differently. This means that in (b) you don't have to discuss your academic interests in detail because you will doing it here. In the context of your answer, provide the list they ask for. You can only focusing on two or three areas of legal interest in the application form.  I suggest you come across as someone with a very focused academic plan. Your academic plan at Harvard should be consistent with your future career plans.

Please elaborate on your plans. 

You should use this space to provide a specific career plan. You will have already talked about your future in (b), but at a more conceptual level. Here you should provide details of your future plans.

One thing to keep in mind: HARVARD IS FOR LEADERS. It does not matter if your leadership is as a judge, a prosecutor, a leading attorney in your field, a government expert, a scholar, or an in-house legal counsel, Harvard is looking for people who will make a difference. Your career plan is the place to show how you will use the legal knowledge you acquire at Harvard to become a credit to the legal profession. In (b) you will focus on "why?"


Now back to (b):

(b)Please tell us something about yourself—in particular, why you wish to pursue an LL.M. degree at Harvard and how doing so connects with what you have done in the past and what you plan to do in the future.
Given that you don't need to provide the details of either your academic plan at Harvard or your career plans, there is plenty of room in (b) to focus on what Harvard wants to know:

1.Why do you want an LL.M. at Harvard? Explain clearly the reason(s) for obtaining an LL.M. and at Harvard in particular.


2. Connect to the past: You need to reveal something about yourself, in particular your motivations for pursuing a legal career and need to trace that motivation to your desire to pursue an LL.M. Tell a story that reveals something about you. If you are having difficulty understanding how to do that, I suggest taking a look at my earlier posts on law school essays.


3. Connect to the future: You need to explain why an LL.M. will help you achieve your future goals. The details for that plan will be discussed in your career plan essay. If you are having difficulty formulating goals, please click here.


A great (b) answer should effectively provide the conceptual backbone that connects all four essays because essay (b) is about your past and future motivations as a legal professional. Those motivations should certainly impact what legal issue you write about in (a) as well as your academic plan at Harvard and your future career plans.


Putting together a great HLS application is a time-consuming labor of love, but if approached early enough, it really is manageable.


-Adam Markus

I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.


ハーバード 米国ロースクール 米国大学法学院 大学院入学 カウンセリング コンサルティング 合格対策 合格率 エッサイ LLM留学

July 15, 2012

Q&A with Columbia Law School LL.M Class of 2012 Alumnus

In addition to MBA admissions consulting, I work with a small number of clients each year who are applying to Master of Laws (LL.M.) programs.  I developed expertise on LL.M. consulting back when I still working at was the Princeton Review of Japan.  When I went independent and established my own consulting service and this blog in 2007, I decided to focus primarily on MBA and secondarily on LL.M.   I have been extremely picky about my LL.M. clients.  So far, since going independent, they have all been admitted to Harvard, Yale, Columbia, Chicago, and/or University of California, Berkeley.  More of my LL.M.  clients have been admitted to  and attended Columbia Law School (followed by Harvard) than anywhere else, so it seems fitting that my first LL.M. Q&A should be with a graduate from that program.
 
My former client, CLS2012, who recently graduated from Columbia, describes himself as follows: “I  read law as an undergraduate and worked as a law firm associate for 5 years prior to undertaking the LL.M. program at Columbia University. After graduation,  I returned to work as a senior associate at an international law firm.“
-------------------
 

Adam: Looking back on your Columbia LL.M. experience, what do you think you have gained?

CLS2012: I have gained so much from my Columbia LL.M. experience, including the chance to study under some outstanding professors, to meet and network with other people from all over the world and from all walks of life, and to experience living in New York for a year. I particularly enjoyed the different approach taken by the professors at Columbia as compared to the more conservative approach I had previously been exposed to while studying law as an undergraduate. The professors at Columbia focused not only on what the law is, but what it should be and brought in political, social and economic analysis to inform their legal discussions. This has taught me to approach the law in a more creative and thoughtful way and to think more effectively about problem solving and finding solutions when confronted with legal issues. The experience and knowledge gained has been very valuable and will influence the way I approach and think about the law in my future work and career.

Adam: What parts of the program have you liked the most? The least?

CLS2012: The part of the program I enjoyed the most was the flexibility and the ability to tailor the LL.M. program to what one was interested in. There were so many interesting courses that it was really a struggle to fit all that I wanted to do within the number of courses I was allowed. Further, besides the traditional law courses, there were a lot of very practical courses like a course on investment banking where students were taught how to do investment banking work, as well as a large number of other courses on subjects like mergers and acquisitions and deals, which were taught by practitioners from some of the top New York law firms. LL.M. students can also choose to take a number of courses at other schools in Columbia such as Columbia Business School and have the courses taken at the other schools count towards the LL.M. degree. It should be noted that the workload can be heavy, especially if one chooses to do near the maximum number of courses one is allowed to do. Further, the school requires all LL.M. candidates to complete an LL.M. paper, which is a major writing project involving original research, in order to graduate.

The part of the program I liked the least was the fact that a number of the most popular courses were scheduled at the same time, meaning that one had to prioritize the courses one really wanted to do over other courses. This appeared to have been done to ensure that most students had the chance to get into some of the more popular courses, but given that the LL.M. program is only a year long, and that some courses are only conducted once either during the Fall or Spring term, it meant that in some cases, a number of LL.M. students did not get all the courses they wanted. That being said, the large number of courses offered by the law school did mitigate this somewhat and most LL.M. students were relatively happy with the courses they got in the end as it was normally possible for one to get most of the courses one wanted.

Adam:: What most surprised you about Columbia Law School?

CLS2012: The school really went out of its way to try and ensure that all LL.M. students enjoyed themselves during their year there. This was done mainly by the law school and to some extent the university organizing a large number of events, such as frequent drink sessions on Friday evening, a cruise down the Hudson river which went past the Statute of Liberty and many other similar type events to ensure that LL.M. students got to explore and enjoy New York.

Adam:: How would you describe the atmosphere of the school?

CLS2012: In general, the school had a very friendly and welcoming feel to it. LL.M. students take classes with J.D. students and so you get a chance to interact with both the LL.M. and the J.D. students in a number of settings. Most of the people I met in law school were friendly and genuinely interested in meeting and interacting with the other students. One thing to note though is that one tends to get to know and interact more with the J.D. and LL.M. student who happen to be interested in the same subjects and courses. While I knew most of the corporate law focused LL.M. and J.D. students quite well, I had less opportunity to interact with the LL.M. and J.D. students who focused on other subjects such as international law.

The quality of the faculty was amazing. The professors were mostly very nice and made time to speak to and interact with students even though some of them were very eminent names in their chosen fields. A few of the professors were outstanding, in that they were genuinely interested in the progress of their students during the course of the term and frequently revised the structure of their courses in light of student feedback received over the course of the term. Special mention must also go to the staff of the graduate legal studies department who were in charge of LL.M. students. They were lovely and always very helpful even though they were constantly bombarded with questions and issues by the LL.M. students.

Adam:: What are hot topics, activities, classes, etc. at Columbia right now?

CLS2012: There were frequent talks and lectures on a wide range of topics organized by the law school(there were several lectures and workshops held by guest speakers almost every day) including lectures given by two sitting US Supreme Court justices during the time I was there. The University also organized a lot of lectures and conferences and invited a lot of world-renowned speakers to come and speak at the university on a myriad range of topics.  It was an amazing experience to be able to attend some of those lectures.

Adam:: How did you feel about living in New York City?

CLS2012: I loved it. New York City is amazing in terms of the number of things to do. In the time I was there, I visited most of the museums including the Metropolitan Museum, the Museum of Modern Art, the Guggenheim Museum, visited a number of tourist spots such as the Statue of Liberty, watched a number of sporting events including the US Open and the New York Knicks at Madison Square Garden and tried out all kinds of cuisine at eating places all over New York. The energy and dynamism of New York City just cannot be described, you have to be there to feel it.  

Adam:: Do you have any specific advice for those considering application to Columbia’s LL.M. program?

CLS2012: While good academics are a prerequisite, previous work experience is very important for any potential applicants who wish to apply to Columbia’s LL.M. program. Most of the LL.M. students had at least two to three years of work experience. LL.M. students also came from both the public and the private sector, the admissions committee appears to like diversity in life experiences and the resulting mix of ideas and perspectives it brings to the classroom. The personal statement is very important as it is the main way in which the admissions committee can get a feel as to what your motivations are and whether you are a good fit for the program, not only in terms of what you might gain from it, but also what you can contribute to it. Finally the large number of courses and the flexibility in structuring your program of study means that Columbia is a good fit for both people who already know what they want to focus on and for people who may want to try out and take a range of different subjects that they have not previously studied.  

Adam:: Anything else you would like to tell us?

CLS2012: Columbia Law School is situated at the main Columbia University campus in the Morningside Heights neighborhood in Manhattan. Morningside Heights tends to be albeit more quiet and feels more like a student town and an oasis of calm when compared to the hustle and bustle of places like midtown Manhattan and Greenwich Village. I would encourage people considering applying to the Columbia LL.M. program to visit the campus and the law school to get a feel as to whether they would like living in Morningside Heights as well as the atmosphere at the law school and/or Columbia University in general. The good news is that if you like hustle and bustle, the more lively parts of Manhattan are just a short subway ride away from Morningside Heights.
-------------------

I want to thank  for taking the time to answer my questions. 


-Adam Markus

I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.

米国ロースクール 米国大学法学院 大学院入学 カウンセリング コンサルティング 合格対策 合格率 エッサイ LLM留学 

July 03, 2012

My 2011-2012 Admissions Season in Retrospect

I wanted to provide a final take on the 2011-2012 admissions season for my clients.  Here are my select client results for 2009-2012:
MBA Comprehensive Service Client Select Results 2009-2012
School2012201120102009Total
Cambridge1 client applied and withdrew after admission to LBS2237
Columbia635216
Cornell Johnson02114
Chicago Booth544417
Duke2 2228
HBS41027
IESENo clients applied for 2012 2327
IMD 11215
INSEAD763216
Kellogg432413
LBS232310
Michigan (2Y, not GMBA) 24219
MIT626115
OxfordNo clients applied for 2012 32510
Stanford GSB23218
Tuck12216
UC Berkeley Haas 11114
UCLA 11158
Wharton712515
Clients in various years also admitted to Stanford Sloan, MIT Sloan Masters, NYU MBA, Yale MBA, and other top MBA programs. Results above are only for my comprehensive clients and do not include interview-only clients admitted to HBS, Stanford, MIT, Wharton, Columbia, and other top programs. You can find my full client results and testimonials here.

LL.M. Clients
-->
I work with a small number of LL.M. clients who are consistently admitted to top US Law Schools. For 2012 admission, I worked with 5 clients: One client was admitted to Yale, another was admitted to Harvard, and  one or more clients were admitted to Berkeley, Chicago, Columbia, Cornell, Georgetown, PENN, and UCLA. In 2011 and 2010, I worked with only 1 LL.M. client, in both years, my clients were accepted to Columbia. In 2009, 2 LL.M. clients were admitted to Harvard and another client was accepted at Columbia. 
Given that 2011-2012 was my tenth year as a graduate admissions consultant, I can honestly say it was the best ever. I have had the opportunity to work with an incredibly diverse range of remarkable people from Bangladesh, Czech Republic, Canada, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, United States, Taiwan, and Turkey. "My results" are theirs, I merely helped. I thank them for choosing to take my advice and putting in the hard work necessary to get into the world's top MBA programs. 

I celebrated my tenth season by traveling with my wife from April to the middle of June to Singapore, Turkey, Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, The Netherlands, Luxembourg, Belgium, The Czech Republic, Israel, Austria, Bulgaria and Switzerland, but not necessarily in that order. It was a long and amazing trip. Along the way, I visited IESE in April and IMD in May. Since getting back to Tokyo I have been having initial consultations with potential clients and I am already starting to work with some clients on their first round applications. I am back writing the blog on a more or less constant basis and hope to have many posts up in July and August before I get real busy.


-Adam Markus

I am a graduate admissions consultant who works with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. Please note that initial consultations are not offered when I have reached full capacity or when I determine that I am not a good fit with an applicant.
Real Time Web Analytics