MIT Sloan's currentJapanese students and alumni will be holding an informational event in Tokyo on 8/28. It is limited to 100 people so I suggest registering as soon as possible.
-Adam
MIT Sloan School of Managementの在校生・卒業生による学校説明会を開催致します。参加お申込はこちらから(先着100名様限り:当日は確認メールのプリントアウトをご持参下さい)。
日程:8月28日(日)
時間:14:00-16:00 (13:30より受付開始)
場所:六本木アカデミーヒルズ49 カンファレンスルーム1+2
内容(予定):
1. 基調講演-井澤吉幸氏(株式会社ゆうちょ銀行 取締役代表執行役社長、MIT Sloan Asian Executive Board Member)
2. 学校紹介プレゼンテーション
3. 在校生・卒業生パネルディスカッション
4. 在校生・卒業生への個別Q&Aセッション
* 本説明会は在校生・卒業生による自主的な企画イベントであり、アドミッションプロセスとは一切関係ありません
* 当日はカジュアルな服装でお越しください
The Source for Independent Advice on MBA, LL.M. & Graduate Admissions
Go to a better blog!
You can find a better version of my blog at http://www.adammarkus.com/blog/.
Be sure to read my Key Posts on the admissions process. Topics include essay analysis, resumes, recommendations, rankings, and more.
July 11, 2011
July 01, 2011
10 Really Stupid Things that MBA Admissions Applicants Do
I thought it might be time for a list. Since it is summer, I suggest reading this while enjoying a cool drink or two (or three...). This is a list of 10 really stupid things that MBA applicants do. Try to avoid doing these things if you are an MBA applicant. But if you do them, please be advised that my reapplication consulting services are available to help you recover from your mistakes.
10 Really Stupid Things that MBA Admissions Applicants Do:
1. Have someone else write their essays for them. You will be able to get away with it if you have someone who can perfectly capture your voice without turning your essay into something obviously written by a hack journalist moonlighting as an admissions consultant, generic content that an unimaginative ghost writing drone produces, or an essay obviously written by a native English speaker when you are not (as demonstrated by TOEFL, IELTS, GMAT and/or background).
2. Ignoring admissions data when selecting schools. While you are not reducible to a set of statistics, you had better use that benchmark to get a sense of the realism of proceeding with application to any particular school. Knowing what level of competition you face will best help you gauge the difficulty of admission. Taking calculated risks is necessary skill for any successful investor in anything, so do your research. For a risk portfolio approach to select schools, please see here.
3. Going only by statistics when selecting schools. For US schools, 10% of all admitted applicants are below the school's reported 80% range for admits in terms of GMAT, GPA, or experience. In my experience, applicants can certainly get admitted if they have other aspects to their application that outweigh mere numbers. While the number of exceptions to the rule is limited, the chance for admission still exists. You need to think carefully about how much risk you want to take, but don't merely settle for where you seem to statistically fit if you want to try and gain admission to what you would consider to be a better program. For a risk portfolio approach to select schools, please see here.
4. Treat all MBA programs as the same. Some applicants fail to really look into the really huge differences between programs and as a result cannot ever demonstrate fit in their essays. Learn about fit here.
5. Don't take recommendations seriously. Some ways applicants don't take recommendations seriously include: Providing limited or zero guidance to recommenders who might not actually be familiar with the unique aspects of MBA program recommendations, providing so much information to recommenders that their recommenders essentially paraphrase the applicants essays to the point where it appears the applicant wrote the recommendation(s) and providing obviously forged recommendations. To get around these problems, please see here and here.
6. Provide a user unfriendly resume. The resume is a such key piece of most MBA applications, but some applicants submit resumes that are too technical, only focused on professional experience, provide too little detail, provide too much detail about the wrong things, don't conform to standard resume formats, or otherwise fail as an effective advertising device for the applicant.
7. Don't prepare for interviews. Don't even get me started, it will make me sick to my stomach. Every year I work with clients who get invited to great schools for interviews and some of them simply think they can go in unprepared because they do better that way or that it is not a big deal. Usually interviews are a big deal. Start here.
8. Don't send timely thank you notes to interviewers. I don't care whether you send an actual physical note by mail or by an email, but send a note! It is the sort of minimal politeness that tells an interviewer and an admissions committee should be able to expect.
9. Spend too much time reading online applicant forums. There is nothing more mentally crippling than wasting too much time on online applicants forums, which often have the function of being urban myth producing echo chambers. Don't get me wrong, you should most certainly read them, but if it becomes an excuse (LIKE FACEBOOK) to actually not work on your applications or test preparation, you need to chill out.
10. Fail to network with alumni and current students. One of things that is truly awesome about most MBA programs is the willingness of current students and many alumni to share their experience and inform applicants. Take full advantage of this. If you are too shy to network, an MBA is not for you. Have you considered a career as a blogger?
ビジネススクール エッセイ 大学院入学 カウンセリング コンサルティング 合格対策 MBA留学
10 Really Stupid Things that MBA Admissions Applicants Do:
1. Have someone else write their essays for them. You will be able to get away with it if you have someone who can perfectly capture your voice without turning your essay into something obviously written by a hack journalist moonlighting as an admissions consultant, generic content that an unimaginative ghost writing drone produces, or an essay obviously written by a native English speaker when you are not (as demonstrated by TOEFL, IELTS, GMAT and/or background).
2. Ignoring admissions data when selecting schools. While you are not reducible to a set of statistics, you had better use that benchmark to get a sense of the realism of proceeding with application to any particular school. Knowing what level of competition you face will best help you gauge the difficulty of admission. Taking calculated risks is necessary skill for any successful investor in anything, so do your research. For a risk portfolio approach to select schools, please see here.
3. Going only by statistics when selecting schools. For US schools, 10% of all admitted applicants are below the school's reported 80% range for admits in terms of GMAT, GPA, or experience. In my experience, applicants can certainly get admitted if they have other aspects to their application that outweigh mere numbers. While the number of exceptions to the rule is limited, the chance for admission still exists. You need to think carefully about how much risk you want to take, but don't merely settle for where you seem to statistically fit if you want to try and gain admission to what you would consider to be a better program. For a risk portfolio approach to select schools, please see here.
4. Treat all MBA programs as the same. Some applicants fail to really look into the really huge differences between programs and as a result cannot ever demonstrate fit in their essays. Learn about fit here.
5. Don't take recommendations seriously. Some ways applicants don't take recommendations seriously include: Providing limited or zero guidance to recommenders who might not actually be familiar with the unique aspects of MBA program recommendations, providing so much information to recommenders that their recommenders essentially paraphrase the applicants essays to the point where it appears the applicant wrote the recommendation(s) and providing obviously forged recommendations. To get around these problems, please see here and here.
6. Provide a user unfriendly resume. The resume is a such key piece of most MBA applications, but some applicants submit resumes that are too technical, only focused on professional experience, provide too little detail, provide too much detail about the wrong things, don't conform to standard resume formats, or otherwise fail as an effective advertising device for the applicant.
7. Don't prepare for interviews. Don't even get me started, it will make me sick to my stomach. Every year I work with clients who get invited to great schools for interviews and some of them simply think they can go in unprepared because they do better that way or that it is not a big deal. Usually interviews are a big deal. Start here.
8. Don't send timely thank you notes to interviewers. I don't care whether you send an actual physical note by mail or by an email, but send a note! It is the sort of minimal politeness that tells an interviewer and an admissions committee should be able to expect.
9. Spend too much time reading online applicant forums. There is nothing more mentally crippling than wasting too much time on online applicants forums, which often have the function of being urban myth producing echo chambers. Don't get me wrong, you should most certainly read them, but if it becomes an excuse (LIKE FACEBOOK) to actually not work on your applications or test preparation, you need to chill out.
10. Fail to network with alumni and current students. One of things that is truly awesome about most MBA programs is the willingness of current students and many alumni to share their experience and inform applicants. Take full advantage of this. If you are too shy to network, an MBA is not for you. Have you considered a career as a blogger?
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス
I am a graduate admissions consultant based in Tokyo, Japan with clients worldwide. If you would like to arrange an initial consultation, please complete my intake form, which is publicly available on google docs here, and then send your completed form to adammarkus@gmail.com. You can also send me your resume if it is convenient for you. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. See here for why.
ビジネススクール エッセイ 大学院入学 カウンセリング コンサルティング 合格対策 MBA留学
June 30, 2011
Guest Blogger: 河野太一のGMAT OG12解説 SC24
This is another post from Taichi Kono, author of two textbooks on TOEFL and one on TOEIC and a highly experienced TOEFL, TOEIC, and GMAT instructor. Most of his posts will be in Japanese. This post is on GMAT sentence correction. His other posts can be found here.
-Adam
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
河野塾代表の河野太一です。年来の友人であるAdam Markusさんのご厚意で、"The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 12th Edition"の解説ブログの内容の一部をこちらにアップさせていただくことになりました。オリジナルは河野太一のGMAT OG12解説でご覧いただけます。なお、オリジナルのほうは予告なく内容を変更することがあり、ここに上げたものと相違があることがありますのでご了承ください。私のこれまでの記事やGMAT以外の話題についてはこちらをご覧ください。
(A) SCにおいてS is N’s doingという形はダメ。「・・・が~すること」と日本語訳してしまえばなぜダメかわからなくなるが、英語ではawkwardとしかいいようがない。GMATはこれを撲滅したいらしい。したがって(A)(B)はアウト。
(C) カンマが2つあってorがあるので、A, B, or Cの並列かと一瞬思う。しかし(C)(D)(E)のどれを見てもorが真ん中に来ているし、同じ品詞を並べたものはない。
or の後ろがrenderという動詞であることから、これはどうやらmetabolizeと並列されているようだ。次のカンマの後ろは、such aがついた名詞句。ここで気づくことは、metabolizeは他動詞で、such a chemical irritantはその目的語ではないかということ。動詞と目的語の間に何かを挟むことはよくあるが、動詞をもうひとつ挟んで、どちらの動詞も目的語につ ながるという形もさほど珍しくない。
見るとrenderの後ろにも目的語がないので、どちらの動詞もsuch a ...につながる可能性は高まった。harmlessは形容詞であるから、これはrender O Cという形をもとに、render Cを先に出してOを後に持ってきたと解釈できる。Oを後回しにした理由は、renderの直後に置いたのではmetabolizeともつながることが見え にくくなるし、renderはどちらかと言えば挿入的で、本筋はmetabolize such a ...であるからだ。
これで(C)が正解の可能性が高まったが、such aがちょっと気になる。どこと対応して「そんな」と言っているのかがわからないからだ。これは他の選択肢も見たほうがよい。
(D)はthe chemical irritating itがアウト。「今現在irritateしている」というのが意味的におかしいし、itの指すものが不明。慣れた人なら理屈の前に見た目でダメと判断できるだろう。
(E)を見て気づくことがある。(C)(D)のattempt to tryはredundantだということ。これでほぼ(E)に決まり。後ろを見るとsuch aもなく、これが一番シンプル。
renderはrender O Cという文型を取り、「・・・を~にする」という意味になる。make O Cと同じ用法・意味だが、辞書によれば文語的。たまに見かけるので覚えておいて損はない。
予 備校の授業では、(C)(D)はattempt to tryのredundantでサクっと切られるだろうが、それは結果論。本番でパッと気づく人がどれだけいるだろう。サクっと切れるのは、講師は予習をしているし、何度も解説しているからではないのか。本番では(E)との比較で初めて気づく人が多いだろうし、それでよいのだ。他の解説同様、ここもあえて本番の意識の流れで解説しておいた。
-河野太一
河野塾ではTOEFL/IELTS/GMATの個人授業を提供しております。なかなかスコアが上がらずにお悩みの方、きめの細かい効果的な個人指導をお求めの方は、ぜひinfo@konojuku.comまでお気軽にお問い合わせください。
-Adam
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
河野塾代表の河野太一です。年来の友人であるAdam Markusさんのご厚意で、"The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 12th Edition"の解説ブログの内容の一部をこちらにアップさせていただくことになりました。オリジナルは河野太一のGMAT OG12解説でご覧いただけます。なお、オリジナルのほうは予告なく内容を変更することがあり、ここに上げたものと相違があることがありますのでご了承ください。私のこれまでの記事やGMAT以外の話題についてはこちらをご覧ください。
SC24
前置詞句がカンマまで。dioxin (S) induces (V) the production ... (O)で、関係代名詞that節は、後ろの動詞がareであることと内容から、enzymesにかかるとわかる。(A) SCにおいてS is N’s doingという形はダメ。「・・・が~すること」と日本語訳してしまえばなぜダメかわからなくなるが、英語ではawkwardとしかいいようがない。GMATはこれを撲滅したいらしい。したがって(A)(B)はアウト。
(C) カンマが2つあってorがあるので、A, B, or Cの並列かと一瞬思う。しかし(C)(D)(E)のどれを見てもorが真ん中に来ているし、同じ品詞を並べたものはない。
or の後ろがrenderという動詞であることから、これはどうやらmetabolizeと並列されているようだ。次のカンマの後ろは、such aがついた名詞句。ここで気づくことは、metabolizeは他動詞で、such a chemical irritantはその目的語ではないかということ。動詞と目的語の間に何かを挟むことはよくあるが、動詞をもうひとつ挟んで、どちらの動詞も目的語につ ながるという形もさほど珍しくない。
見るとrenderの後ろにも目的語がないので、どちらの動詞もsuch a ...につながる可能性は高まった。harmlessは形容詞であるから、これはrender O Cという形をもとに、render Cを先に出してOを後に持ってきたと解釈できる。Oを後回しにした理由は、renderの直後に置いたのではmetabolizeともつながることが見え にくくなるし、renderはどちらかと言えば挿入的で、本筋はmetabolize such a ...であるからだ。
これで(C)が正解の可能性が高まったが、such aがちょっと気になる。どこと対応して「そんな」と言っているのかがわからないからだ。これは他の選択肢も見たほうがよい。
(D)はthe chemical irritating itがアウト。「今現在irritateしている」というのが意味的におかしいし、itの指すものが不明。慣れた人なら理屈の前に見た目でダメと判断できるだろう。
(E)を見て気づくことがある。(C)(D)のattempt to tryはredundantだということ。これでほぼ(E)に決まり。後ろを見るとsuch aもなく、これが一番シンプル。
renderはrender O Cという文型を取り、「・・・を~にする」という意味になる。make O Cと同じ用法・意味だが、辞書によれば文語的。たまに見かけるので覚えておいて損はない。
予 備校の授業では、(C)(D)はattempt to tryのredundantでサクっと切られるだろうが、それは結果論。本番でパッと気づく人がどれだけいるだろう。サクっと切れるのは、講師は予習をしているし、何度も解説しているからではないのか。本番では(E)との比較で初めて気づく人が多いだろうし、それでよいのだ。他の解説同様、ここもあえて本番の意識の流れで解説しておいた。
-河野太一
河野塾ではTOEFL/IELTS/GMATの個人授業を提供しております。なかなかスコアが上がらずにお悩みの方、きめの細かい効果的な個人指導をお求めの方は、ぜひinfo@konojuku.comまでお気軽にお問い合わせください。
June 28, 2011
Columbia Business School Essays for January and August 2012 Admission
Columbia Business School has again changed their essay set. This year, applicants applying for 2012 admission will need to write three essays and answer one short question.
You can find testimonials from my clients admitted for CBS here (including one client admitted for J-Term 2012!).
Before discussing the essays, I will discuss who J-Term is for and differences between Early and Regular Decision.
JANUARY 2012 ADMISSIONS
The Accelerated MBA, J-Term, can be great program for those who don't need an internship. All my admitted J-term clients have one thing in common: Real clarity about their goals and strong track records in their professions. J-term is not for career changers, it is those looking to enhance their position within their present career trajectory and/or entrepreneurs. It is critical that you explain why the January Term program is right for you. According to the Columbia website:
The Accelerated MBA is ideal for you if
- you are an entrepreneur;
- you want to join your family business;
- you plan to return to your current employer;
- you are sponsored by your company;
- you want to remain in the same industry;
- you have built a strong professional network in the industry of your choice.
The program is designed for those students who do not want or need an internship. The principal advantage of the 16-month program is its accelerated format, which allows members of the smaller January class to network quickly and effectively and return to the workplace sooner.
Obviously you need to make the case in Essay 1 (The Goals/Why Columbia? Essay) that you meet the special criteria for this program and that an internship is not something critical for you. For those who don't need an internship, this is really a great program.
AUGUST: EARLY VERSUS REGULAR DECISION
Applying for Early Decision is ideal for anyone who considers Columbia to be their first choice and is ready by the application deadline. Columbia takes Early Decision very seriously, so I suggest you do as well. CBS ED really is unique among top MBA programs and the decision to commit to it should not be taken lightly. For my most complete discussion of this issue, please an earlier post, which I will update some year. If you decide to apply for Regular Decision, it is in your interest to apply as early as you can because like the best Broadway Shows, the seats will fill up early.
Applying for Early Decision is ideal for anyone who considers Columbia to be their first choice and is ready by the application deadline. Columbia takes Early Decision very seriously, so I suggest you do as well. CBS ED really is unique among top MBA programs and the decision to commit to it should not be taken lightly. For my most complete discussion of this issue, please an earlier post, which I will update some year. If you decide to apply for Regular Decision, it is in your interest to apply as early as you can because like the best Broadway Shows, the seats will fill up early.
THE ESSAY QUESTIONS
Given significant changes to the questions, I have again had to rethink some of the strategies I used successfully with clients who were admitted in 2009, 2010, and 2011. You find testimonials from some of them here.
All questions are taken from the online application.
SHORT, BUT CRITICAL QUESTION ON GOALS: What is your post-MBA professional goal? (200 characters)
Take this very short statement seriously. While some schools have included such statements as a part of the application, it is not usually the case that such a short statement would be included among the essays.
Remember this is 200 Characters, not words. This would be about 40-50 words.
CBS actually provides examples of possible responses in the online application Essay page:
Example 1: “After my MBA I want to build my expertise in the energy sector and learn more about strategy and decision making by joining a consulting firm specializing in renewable energy and power companies.”
Example 2: “After my MBA I hope to work in business development for a media company that is expanding its market share in Asia.”
Example 3: “My short term goal is to work with an investment firm that utilizes public private partnerships to invest in community development projects.”
As you can see from the above examples, CBS is looking for a short, but a very clear statement of what you intend to do after your MBA. If you have difficulty explaining your immediate post-MBA plans in the space given, I think that is likely an indication that your plans are too complex. Think of this has the briefest possible elevator pitch (see below for more about elevator pitches) you will make for yourself. Obviously what you state here should be backed up by what you discuss in Essay 1 (or the reapplicant essay for reapplicants).
ESSAY 1: THE EXTENDED ELEVATOR PITCH
I think it is best to conceptualize this as an extended elevator pitch because 750 words is too long to be deliver in 1-2 minutes, but could be delivered in 5 minutes. Your job is to convince admissions that your goals fit what Columbia offers.
Considering your post-MBA and long term professional goals, why you are pursuing an MBA at this point in your career? Additionally, why is Columbia Business School a good fit for you? (Maximum 750 words)This a somewhat revised version of Columbia’s standard question. The big change is that this year, Columbia is specifically asking why now in reference to your present career. As result, you will need to explain “Why an MBA now?” in relationship to the work you have done so far. The balance of this question is still focused on the future so don’t let your explanation of your past experience crowd out answering the primary parts of this question: Your goals and fit for Columbia. CAUTION: DO NOT OVER-FOCUS ON YOUR EXPERIENCE HERE, I AM SUGGESTING YOU DISCUSS SUCH EXPERIENCES ONLY IN THE CONTEXT OF AN ARGUMENT ABOUT WHY YOU NEED AN MBA AT THIS STAGE OF YOUR CAREER.
WHY COLUMBIA? The resources available at CBS and Columbia University are vast, so figure out specifically what you want from the school. The program is flexible, so identify your needs from Columbia as specifically as possible. Also keep in mind that CBS recently changed its core curriculum. After all, you want to show them you love and need them For learning about what is hot at Columbia, I suggest taking a look at their blog: Public Offering. Also look at Hermes which provides news on the Columbia community. You will likely want to write about taking a Master Class. Japanese applicants should most certainly visit http://columbiamba.jimdo.com/index.php.
October 13, 2011 Update: Also see http://adam-markus.blogspot.com/2011/10/why-choose-columbia-business-school.html for why Columbia students love Columbia.
Making a clear case why your goals are best achieved at CBS should be at the core of the essay. To make sure that they can see that, be very specific about what you need to learn at CBS to achieve your goals. I suggest reviewing some of the full course descriptions that you can find on their website.
If you are having problems clearly articulating your goals, I suggest using my GAP, SWOT, AND ROI TABLE FOR FORMULATING GRADUATE DEGREE GOALS f (see below). I think Gap, SWOT, and ROI analysis are great ways for understanding what your goals are, why you want a degree, and how you will use it. (Click here for a GMAC report on MBA ROI. )
(To best view the following table, click on it.)

Step 1. Begin by analyzing your "Present Situation." What job(s) have you held? What was/is your functional role(s)? What was/are your responsibilities?
Next, analyze your present strengths and weaknesses for succeeding in your present career. REMEMBER:WHEN YOU ARE THINKING ABOUT YOUR STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESS DON'T ONLY THINK ABOUT WORK, THINK ABOUT OTHER ASPECTS OF YOUR LIFE. In particular, some of your greatest strengths may have been demonstrated outside of work, so make sure you are accounting for them.
Strengths: What are you good at? Where do you add value? What are you praised for? What are you proud of?
Weakness: What are you bad at? What are you criticized for? What do you try to avoid due to your own limitations? What do you fear?
Next, analyze the environment you work in right now. What opportunities exist for your growth and success? What threats could limit your career growth?
Step 2. Now, do the same thing in Step 1 for your "Post-Degree" future after you have earned your graduate degree. IF YOU CANNOT COMPLETE STEP 2, YOU HAVE NOT SUFFICIENTLY PLANNED FOR YOUR FUTURE and therefore you need to do more research and need to think more about it.
Step 3. If you could complete step 2, than you should see the "Gap" between your present and your future. What skills, knowledge, and other resources do you need to close the gap between your present and future responsibilities, strengths, and opportunities?
Step 4. After completing Step 3, you now need to determine how an MBA will add value to you. It is possible that an increased salary as a result of job change will be sufficient "ROI" for the degree to justify itself, but you should show how a degree will allow you to reach your career goals. How will the degree enhance your skills and opportunities and help you overcome your weaknesses and external threats? If you can complete Step 4 than you should be ready to explain what your goals are, why you want a degree, and the relationship between your past and future career, as well as your strengths and weaknesses.
The above table will also help you answer such common interview questions as: Where do you want to work after you finish your degree? Why do you want an MBA (or other degree)? What are you strengths? What are your weaknesses? What are your goals? Thinking about these issues now will help you to develop a fully worked-out strategy for how you will best present yourself both in the application and in an interview.
ARE YOUR GOALS HOT?
Making career goals exciting requires thinking about whether your goals are compelling. Admissions committees ask applicants to write about their goals after graduate school, but can applicants actually know what will be on the cutting-edge in two or three years? While many applicants will be able to successfully apply with relatively standard goals ("I want to be a consultant because..."), communicating aspirations requires going beyond the typical.
Be informed. Columbia Admissions needs to believe you know what you are talking about. If you are changing careers, no one expects you to be an expert, but you should come across as having a clear plan based on real research into your future. If you are planning on staying in your present industry, you should be well informed not only about the companies you have worked for, but about the industry as a whole. If you are not already doing so, read industry related publications and network.
Those August ED and RD applicants who are changing fields should most certainly read industry related publications in their intended field. Additionally I suggest conducting informational interviews with at least one peer level and one senior level person in that field. Conduct a peer level interview to get a good idea of what it would be like to actually work in that industry. Conduct a senior level interview to get the perspective of someone who can see the big picture and all the little details as well.
Don't know anyone in your intended field? Network! One great way to start is through LinkedIn. Another is by making use of your undergraduate alumni network and/or career center.
LEARN WHAT IS HOT. No matter whether you are changing fields or not, learn what is hot now and try to figure out what will be hot by the time you graduate. Now, of course, this is just a plan and chances are that what is hot in your industry or field now may very well be cold in the future. The point is to come across to Columbia Adcom as someone who is not only well informed, but has CUTTING-EDGE knowledge. In addition to Columbia's Public Offering blog, also look at ideas@work, and The Chazen Web Journal of International Business. Some other great general sources for learning what is hot: Harvard Working Knowledge, Harvard Business Review, University of Chicago GSB's Working Papers, The University of Chicago's Capital Ideas, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Knowledge @ Wharton, and MIT Sloan Management Review.
You may also want to do a search on itunes for podcasts: My favorites are Entrepreneurial Thought Leaders (from the Stanford School of Engineering, but totally relevant) Net Impact, Chicago GSB Podcast Series, and Harvard Business IdeaCast. INSEAD, IMD, LBS, and Wharton also have podcasts.
LinkedIn Answers: Also consider joining LinkedIn and make use of LinkedIn Answers. LinkedIn Answers is a great way to tap into cutting edge expertise (including my admissions advice!). Follow LinkedIn's rules and you will often be able to obtain excellent information.
Hoovers: For information about specific companies, Hoovers is just a great way to learn about key facts including competitors (a very useful way of knowing who else you might want to work for and to learn about an industry). While primarily focused on the US, Hoovers does have listings for companies worldwide.
Vault: For scope of coverage, this site is a must. Vault includes both career and admissions information. It includes both company specific and industry-wide information.
Other sources: Read magazines, websites, and books that relate to your intended field.
GETTING TO KNOW YOU: Essay 2
Describe a life experience that has shaped you. The goal of this essay is to get a sense of who you are, rather than what you have achieved professionally. (Maximum 500 words)
This a significant modification from the personality question that was asked last year. The one constant is that CBS is looking to learn about you as person rather than to have a professional accomplishment essay.
Bad answers to this question will likely to do the following:
- Focus too much on action and context and not enough on providing an interpretation of who you are.
- Focus on a professional accomplishment.
- Focus on an important life experience that does not really have any clear selling points about who you are.
I mention the above because I view these as typical problems I see with ineffective answers to this type of question.
An Experience which has shaped you: UCLA has actually been asking about such topics for many years. What is nice about the CBS version is that it is rather open ended. Some possibilities that I can suggest:
- A critical academic experience that determined your career direction.
- Overcoming an obstacle that improved your leadership, teamwork, communication, or other MBA-program and/or career goal relevant skill(s).
- An experience that taught you very important life lessons that you have applied.
- An experience that has played a critical role in the decisions you have made in your life.
- Is the story one that is so obvious from other aspects of my application that much of it is redundant? If so, you need another topic.
- Is the story one that might actually say something negative about me? If so, you need to either modify the story or find a different one.
- Is the story one that helps CBS see why I have the characteristics of someone who can succeed academically and/or professionally? If not, you really need to think whether the story is worth telling CBS.
THREE CHOICES: Essay 3
Essay 3 is completely new for this year. You have to pick one of three options. Each option is quite different. While all three are only 250 words long, you may easily spend much more time writing this essay than Essays 1 or 2. Especially Options A and B are likely to require significant thinking and research. The only option that I recommend for those with very limited time is Option C as it will likely require significantly less to conceptualize and/or research than Options A and B.
THE ELEVATOR PITCH FOR ENTREPRENEURS: Option A:
The annual A. Lorne Weil Outrageous Business Plan Competition is a student initiative managed and run by the Columbia Entrepreneurs Organization (CEO). The competition encourages Columbia MBA students to explore creative entrepreneurial ideas that are sufficiently ambitious in scope and scale to be considered "outrageous." Students explore these ideas while learning firsthand what goes into the development and presentation of a solid business proposal. Develop your own "outrageous" business idea. In essay form, compose your "elevator pitch." (Maximum 250 words)
While I think this question really is mainly for those who have entrepreneurial objectives, it could also be used by those who want to highlight their creativity. I think anyone whose stated goals to CBS are entrepreneurial has a real obligation to write on this topic. For everyone else, it is just an option that should be exercised if you have a good idea.
I think it is a very good idea to look at the winners of the Weil Competition to get a sense of what Columbia perceives as outrageous in order to realize the following:
1. You should actually be coming up with something that is practical in terms of its implementation, not something so outrageous as to be absurd.
2. The winners of this prize have been actual scalable businesses that serve a real need. Some are very standard in terms of their function, such as retail products, while others serve more of a social entrepreneurial purpose.
3. They might be rather niche products or services, but alternatively (like 2011's 1st Place winner, PoWaSol) have the possibility of serving a very number of consumers.
4. To get a sense of what kind of elevator pitch is actually used, I suggest watching some of them on Youtube. I watched 2011 1st Prize winner Srikanth Nimmagadda's pitch for PoWaSol and 2011 2nd Prize winner Andres Small ’12 and Alex Nobel's pitch for Flipper (I WANT ONE!).
While you should not drive yourself crazy making sure no one has ever come up with your idea before, please try to make sure that are not reinventing some obvious wheel: Google is your friend!
SELLING YOUR POTENTIAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE CBS COMMUNITY: Option B: Columbia deeply values its vibrant student community, the building of which begins at orientation when admitted students are assigned to clusters of 65 to 70 fellow students who take most of the first-year core classes together. During the first weeks of school, each cluster selects a Cluster Chair. Further strengthening the student community are the nearly 100 active student organizations at Columbia Business School, ranging from cultural to professional to community service-oriented. Leadership positions within the cluster and/or clubs offer hands-on management and networking opportunities for students as they interact with fellow students, administrators, faculty members, alumni, and practitioners.
You are running for either Cluster Chair or a club leadership position of your choosing. Compose your campaign speech. (Maximum 250 words)
Just as in Option A, you are being tested on your ability to effectively sell something to someone in a very limited amount of space. Instead of selling a business plan, you are now selling your potential to contribute as Cluster Chair or as a club leader.
London Business School has for years been asking applicants to explain how they would specifically contribute to particular clubs and activities, but CBS is taking that a bit further in as much as you actually have to write an actual speech designed to convince your fellow students. A successful answer here will do the following:
- Demonstrate your knowledge of what a Cluster Chair does or of the specific club you are interested in. Therefore, to successfully write an answer to this question, you actually need to know quite a lot about being a Cluster Chair or the club you are interested in. Beyond reviewing the CBS website, I strongly recommend making contact with current students or recent graduates (See Essay 1 for links to CBS resources). In particular, if you are interested in a club, you should make a specific attempt to learn about that club. Gold stars will go to those who are not shy and get actual information from students.
- Show clearly why you are the right woman or man for the job. Your selling points, whether based on past experience, personality, or particular skills should be clear.
- Show clearly what you would do if you held the position. It is not enough to say elect me, explain what you agenda would be.
- Communicate this in a compelling fashion. You are making speech to get elected, so you need to engage your audience and convince them.
- After you have written your speech, actually deliver it in order to revise it.
A GIFT: Option C: Founded nearly three decades ago, the Executives in Residence Program at Columbia Business School integrates senior executives into the life of the School. Current executives in residence include more than a dozen experts in areas ranging from media and investment banking to private equity and management. A hallmark of the program is one-on-one counseling sessions in which executives advise students about their prospective career choices.
Select one of the current executives in residence with whom you would like to meet during your time at Columbia. Explain your selection and tell us how you would best utilize your half hour one-on-one session. (Maximum 250 words)
ANYONE CAN ANSWER THIS QUESTION! Unlike Options A&;B, which I would consider to be hard, Option C is much easier to write. I am betting that CBS gets more Option C answers than Option A or B answers. A good answer would do the following:
- Show you understand enough about a particular executive in residence to select him or her. The question above includes program links. You should read the bios of each executive to select who best meets your needs.
- Align with your career goals and reasons for pursuing an MBA. I think this might be too obvious to state, but I am doing it anyway. You should be able to justify why a particular executive in residence would best meet your needs.
- Explain what you would hope to learn.
ANY CONCERNS?: Optional Essay
Is there any further information that you wish to provide the Admissions Committee? Please use this space to provide an explanation of any areas of concern in your academic record or your personal history. (Maximum 500 words)
As with other school's optional questions, do not put an obvious essay for another school here. If you read the above, it should be clear enough that this is the place to explain anything negative or potentially negative in your background. If you have no explanation for something negative, don't bother writing about it. For example if your GPA is 2.9 and you have no good explanation for why it is 2.9, don't bother writing something that looks like a lame excuse. This is more likely to hurt than help you. In the same vein, don't waste the committee's time telling them that your GMAT is a much better indicator than your GPA (the opposite is also true). They have heard it before and they will look at both scores and can draw their own conclusions without you stating the obvious. That said, if you have a good explanation for a bad GPA, you should most certainly write about it.
You can certainly write on something positive here if you think its omission will be negative for you, but before you do, ask yourself these questions:
1. If they did not ask it, do they really need to know it?
2. Will the topic I want to discuss significantly improve my overall essay set?
3. Is the topic one that would not be covered from looking at other parts of my application?
4. Is the essay likely to be read as being a specific answer for Columbia and not an obvious essay for another school?
If you can answer "Yes!" to all four questions, it might be a good topic to write about.
FOR REAPPLICANTS:
The online instructions: Reapplicants: If you have applied to Columbia Business School within the past year, you are required to answer the "What is your post-MBA professional goal? " question and submit the reapplication essay. If your last application was more than one year ago, you must answer Essays 1, 2 and 3.
REAPPLICATION ESSAY: How have you enhanced your candidacy since your previous application? Please detail your progress since you last applied, reiterate your post-MBA and long-term professional goals, and address why Columbia Business School is a good fit for you. (Maximum 750 words).
The period of Reapplication at Columbia is rather limited, 12 months from the time of the initial application. If apply to Columbia more than 12 months after an initial application, you should apply as a new applicant. Columbia's Reapplication Checklist can be found here. You will not be able to submit new answers to essays 1-3, but will have to use only the reapplicant essay.
When judging reapplicants, Columbia makes it perfectly clear what they are expecting. See here for their criteria.
Clearly this essay gives you the opportunity to:
1. Showcase what has changed since your last application that now makes you a better candidate.
2. Refine your goals. I think it is reasonable that they may have altered since your last application, but if the change is extreme, you had better explain why.
3. Make a better case for why Columbia is right for you.
For more about my many posts on reapplication, please see here.
CONCLUSION: Columbia Loves to Be Loved
One thing that is consistent about Columbia Business School is that they want to know that their school is your first choice. If you have an alumni interview you can be expected to be asked about that very directly. See here for my advice on Columbia interviews.
When judging reapplicants, Columbia makes it perfectly clear what they are expecting. See here for their criteria.
Clearly this essay gives you the opportunity to:
1. Showcase what has changed since your last application that now makes you a better candidate.
2. Refine your goals. I think it is reasonable that they may have altered since your last application, but if the change is extreme, you had better explain why.
3. Make a better case for why Columbia is right for you.
For more about my many posts on reapplication, please see here.
CONCLUSION: Columbia Loves to Be Loved
One thing that is consistent about Columbia Business School is that they want to know that their school is your first choice. If you have an alumni interview you can be expected to be asked about that very directly. See here for my advice on Columbia interviews.
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス
アダム マーカス
If you would like to arrange an initial consultation for my counseling services, please complete my intake form, which is publicly available on google docs here, and then send your completed form to adammarkus@gmail.com. You can also send me your resume if it is convenient for you. Please don't email me any essays, other admissions consultant's intake forms, your life story, or any long email asking for a written profile assessment. The only profiles I assess are those with people who I offer initial consultations to. See here for why.
MBA留学 ビジネススクール カウンセリング コンサルティング コロンビア・ビジネス・スクール エッセイ
June 27, 2011
MBAプログラム 在校生・卒業生による説明会開催!
One of my former clients asked that I post information about this unofficial LBS information session to be held in Tokyo on September 4, 2011. It will be in Japanese.
-Adam
-Adam
在校生・卒業生によるLondon Business School MBAプログラムを2011年9月4日(日)に開催致します。MBAプログラムにフォーカスし、プログラムの説明、卒業生によるキーノートスピーチ、パネルディスカッション、ネットワーキングなど、London Business Schoolの魅力を皆様により深く伝えられるようなセッションを計画しております。
※MBAプログラム以外のプログラム希望者を制限するわけではございません。
※別途開催されるAdmission主催の説明会とは異なり、非公式説明会となっております。
※日本語での開催となります。
日時
2011年9月4日(日)
13:00 開場
13:30 プログラム説明会・キーノート・パネルディスカッション
15:00 ネットワーキングセッション
16:00 終了
13:00 開場
13:30 プログラム説明会・キーノート・パネルディスカッション
15:00 ネットワーキングセッション
16:00 終了
会場
日経ホール&カンファレンスルーム
最寄駅:大手町・竹橋
最寄駅:大手町・竹橋
会場の収容人数の都合から、参加希望者はこちからサインアップをお願いいたします。
※参加登録完了の確認のメールはお送りしておりません。二重登録などにはお気をつけ下さい。
万が一キャンセルされる場合は、こちらからご連絡下さい。
パートナーの方の参加もウエルカムでございます。
皆様のご参加、お待ちしております。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
tags
- Admissions Consulting (506)
- application (139)
- Babson (1)
- Cambridge Judge (4)
- Campus Visit (2)
- Chicago (59)
- Columbia Business School (47)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell (2)
- Darden (3)
- Duke (10)
- EMBA (2)
- entrepreneurship (1)
- Essays (268)
- European Business Schools (23)
- Executive Education (2)
- Finance (2)
- Fulbright (1)
- GMAT (41)
- Graduate School (59)
- GRE (7)
- Guru Time (6)
- Harvard Law School (8)
- HBS (97)
- Humor (1)
- IELTS (1)
- IESE (5)
- IMD (19)
- Indian Business School (1)
- INSEAD (28)
- Interviews (136)
- ISB (2)
- Japanese (19)
- Jessica King (3)
- Kellogg (27)
- Knewton (6)
- LBS (5)
- LGBT (1)
- LGO (1)
- LLM (62)
- LLM留学 (77)
- London Business School (19)
- MBA (570)
- MBA留学 (587)
- McCombs (5)
- Michigan Ross (9)
- MIT Sloan (36)
- Networking (1)
- NYU Stern (15)
- Oxford Said (9)
- professional (1)
- rants (5)
- reapplication (12)
- Recommendation (12)
- Resume (10)
- Scholarships (1)
- School Selection (61)
- Stanford GSB (72)
- Steve Green (29)
- Taichi Kono (27)
- Tepper (1)
- TOEFL (9)
- TOEFL/GMAT/GRE (48)
- Tuck (17)
- UC Berkeley Haas (15)
- UCLA (7)
- UNC (1)
- USC (1)
- USC Marshall (1)
- waitlist (5)
- Wharton (62)
- Yale SOM (1)
- YouTube Posts (1)
- 大学院 (6)
- 大学院留学 (39)
- 大学院留学、 (7)
- 大学院留学、HBS (1)
- 日本語 (2)