Go to a better blog!


You can find a better version of my blog at http://www.adammarkus.com/blog/.

Be sure to read my Key Posts on the admissions process. Topics include essay analysis, resumes, recommendations, rankings, and more.

October 06, 2007

LL.M. Acceptance Rate Table Revised

I have now obtained complete information from UCLA and Michigan, Ann Arbor, as well as additions/corrections from New York University and Vanderbilt. While I thank all four schools for their assistance, I want to especially thank UCLA and Michigan, Ann Arbor for providing the complete data necessary for LL.M. applicants to make informed decisions based on knowing their actual chance for admission. I hope that other schools will follow.

One thing that has been very interesting for me was to see the relative value of my predictive model based on looking at J.D. yield rates. As you can see my model effectively predicted the LL.M. acceptance rate close to the actual rate at UCLA, but underestimated the actual rate at Michigan by 7%.

(CLICK TO ENLARGE. For the excel file, email me adammarkus@gmail.com)
At least for those admitted for this Fall, the yield rates at UCLA are almost the same for the J.D. and LL.M. programs with it being slightly easier to enter into the LL.M program. In the case of Michigan there is greater variation and it is significantly easier to get into LL.M program. Approximately 1 in 5 applicants are admitted to UCLA's LL.M. program and 1 in 3 to Michigan's. We can also conclude that at least for these two schools, the US News and World Report's ranking is not a very good predicator of difficulty of admission because Michigan ranks 8th and UCLA ranks 15th, but the former is significantly easier to enter.

One thing to keep in mind is that I am using data for the most recent year reported. Given the overall limited nature of the LL.M. data set, I have reported whatever numbers I could find. Ideally, I would be looking at one set of data for the same year, while I am comparing the most recent year reported even if it is different. I also made the decision to use this year's data for UCLA and Michigan because those numbers are the best guide for this year's applicants.

I will continue to try and obtain better information from other schools and report back on any progress that I make.

-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

コロンビア, ハーバード, シカゴ, スタンフォード, 米国ロースクール、米国大学法学院, 大学院入学, カウンセリング, コンサルティング, 合格対策, LLM留学

LL.M. Program Admissions Data Updates

Please see my earlier post before reading this one.
Updates are being made to this entry in reverse chronological order (a blog within a blog?). I have now updated my table on LL.M. admissions rates.

I will be using this post to provide additional admissions data that I receive from LL.M. programs. Once I have obtained sufficient responses, I will create a new LL.M. admissions table. I am posting this information in the order that I am receiving it from schools. Quotes are from the emails I received.

NOTE: At this time, I am only reporting on helpful responses. I have already received a few unsigned, unhelpful bureaucratic responses, but I will go through the process of finding the right person to talk to before mentioning such responses.

Update on October 6, 2007
I have now received complete data from UCLA and the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor. I thank both schools for providing this information.

UCLA:

2006-2007: Applied: 634 Admitted: 203 Enrolled:50

2007-2008: Applied: 697 Admitted: 157 Enrolled: 48

NOTE: "Last year was our first year of our newly expanded program and we had 50 students. Previous years typically had 10-12 students."

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor:

2005-2006: Applied:542 Admitted:207 Enrolled: 43

2006-2007: Applied: 585 Admitted: 191 Enrolled: 34

2007-2008: Applied: 522 Admitted: 180 Enrolled:46



Update on October 2nd: UCLA
I have received a very positive response from UCLA. UCLA has provided me with data for Fall 2007: 687 applications and 48 attending.


Update on September 29th
1. I received email today from the University of Michigan:
It will not be possible to respond to this request within the
five-day period accorded by the Michigan Freedom of Information Act. However, under Section 5 (2) (d) of the Act, the University is permitted to extend the deadline for not more than 10 business days. The University will respond to your request on or before October 12, 2007.

Therefore I expect that I will have good data for Michigan. by the 12th.

2. I contacted the media offices at UCLA and UCB, but have received nothing concrete yet. UPDATED: SEE UCLA RESPONSE ABOVE.

3. Based on my sitemeter data, I know this blog has been looked at by some of the schools I contacted that have yet to reply to me. Of course, it could have been anyone from those schools, but the timing and extent of the visit to my site is highly coincidental.


NEW DATA PROVIDED ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2007:
1. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY
"Last year we received over 2,000 applications for approximately 425 open seats in the LL.M. program." I will eliminate the 40 from the Singapore campus in my next table.

2. VANDERBILT
"Vanderbilt has 26 LLM students this year (one was missing from the photo)."

3. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ANN ARBOR
Provided an immediately helpful response. They have a formal FOIA process. I anticipate receiving data from them soon.



-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

コロンビア, ハーバード, シカゴ, スタンフォード, 米国ロースクール、米国大学法学院, 大学院入学, カウンセリング, コンサルティング, 合格対策, 合格率, LLM留学

October 05, 2007

The value of an MBA and the admissions process

As readers to my blog may have gathered, I am fairly neutral about the value of an MBA. See here for example. I think it is great and valuable to some and a waste of time and money for others. Honestly to hold any other opinion would reduce my effectiveness as a counselor because I don't assume the value of the degree until an applicant has clearly made a strong argument for it. By remaining relatively objective, I can best help my clients clarify and explain their own reasoning both in their essays and interviews.

For international applicants, when you read articles like the one mentioned below, ask yourself if what is described actually represents conditions in your country. I know of far too many successful past clients to believe that the MBA is no longer valuable, even one obtained from a school that is not top ten.

Thus when I read articles like B-school Confidential: MBAs May Be Obsolete, I can see both the strengths and weaknesses of the argument. The author states that:
[T]he competition to get into a top-tier b-school [is] fierce. So much so that you probably need a consultant to help you get in. Wondering how effective those consultants are at gaming the system? So effective that schools are publicly saying they're trying to change the application process in order to undermine the effectiveness of application coaches.

However, she does not specify what the schools are doing. As far as I can see, schools are not doing a thing differently than in the past. The funny thing about this is that there are perfectly good ways to eliminate unethical practices:

1. Eliminate essays completely and replace them with an oral and/or written examination under the auspices of GMAC. This would eliminate ghostwriting. Conduct a school specific interview for those who have passed the initial round.

2. Standardize recommendations and require two through a common GMAC controlled process. This would reduce the burden on recommenders who find themselves needing to write between 4 and 8 separate recs for an applicant, all of which ask slightly different questions using different formats.

3. Some schools are already verifying recs for accepted applicants, so why not standardize this as well?

4. Eliminate all phone interviews unless they are conducted in a testing center so as to eliminate the possibility that the interviewee is using notes.

5. Record all interviews not conducted by admissions officers. Review said interviews to guarantee that alumni interviews are being conducted in English and that the alum's or student interviewer's comments about the applicant accurately reflect the actual interview.

As to the kind of counseling I do, none of the above would have significant impact on it except that I would read less essays and do more interview practice. Coaching on how to tell effective stories, how to articulate goals, how to select programs, and how to effectively present yourself, the core things any ethical graduate admission consultant does, would not be impacted. If I do my job right, which is the way I do it, no admissions officer will detect anything wrong because there is nothing illegitimate taking place. Effective coaching is all about making someone be the best that they can, but not about making someone into something they are not.

Write Comments or contact me directly at adammarkus@gmail.com
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス




October 04, 2007

Chicago GSB's 10 Things to Consider Before Sending Your Application

If you are planning to apply to The University of Chicago GSB'S MBA for Fall 2008, I suggest reading the GSB's "Admissions Insider: Top 10 List of Things to Consider Before You Submit Your Application." This is a very useful checklist of things to do before you apply.
--Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

MBA留学

September 28, 2007

Wharton MBA Fall 2008 Essay Questions & Tokyo Event

Click here for my Fall 2009 (Class of 2011) essay analysis.


UPDATE AS OF 2/8/2008:
I will not change my comments below regarding the ethics of Wharton because I think it is important that readers know what I had thought. I stand by my analysis of the essay questions, but given recent events, completely renounce my statements regarding the ethics of the admissions office. Wharton is a great school, but should have been better served by that office. I hope that corrective action is taken at PENN by those who should know better.


I should disclose that I have a bias for the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business, not only because of the great clients I have worked with who attend/have attended there, but because of the very open nature of Wharton's admissions process. As someone who believes strongly that the only ethical approach to admissions is one based on providing applicants with complete information about a transparent process, I consider Wharton's admissions practices a yardstick by which to measure other schools. Click here to learn more about Wharton's admissions process.

Wharton's Director of Admissions and Financial Aid, Thomas Caleel, gave an extensive presentation in Tokyo on September 26, 2007 that was a further demonstration of the very honest and applicant friendly approach that is the hallmark of this school's process.

I mention all of this because I think with Wharton, they are not engaged in trying to stump applicants. To paraphrase what Mr. Caleel said about his own approach to interview questions (he conducts admissions interviews including Tokyo hub interviews), "I ask easy questions that are hard to answer." I think this is equally true of Wharton's essays. They are not trick questions, but that does not make them easy to answer.

First, here is the entire set of questions:

Essay 1 (Required)
Describe your career progress to date and your future short-term and long-term career goals. How do you expect a Wharton MBA to help you achieve these goals, and why is now the best time for you to join our program? (1,000 words)

Essay 2 (Required)
Describe a failure or setback that you have experienced. What role did you play and what did you learn about yourself? (500 words)

Essay 3 (Required)
Tell us about a situation in which you were an outsider. What did you learn from the experience? (500 words)

Essay 4 (Required)
Please Complete One Of The Following Two Questions:

  1. Where in your background would we find evidence of your leadership capacity and/or potential? (500 words)
  2. Is there anything about your background or experience that you feel you have not had the opportunity to share with the Admissions Committee in your application? If yes, please explain. (500 words)

Essay 5 (Optional)
If you feel there are extenuating circumstances of which the Committee should be aware, please explain them here (e.g., unexplained gaps in work experience, choice of recommenders, TOEFL waiver request, inconsistent or questionable academic performance, significant weaknesses in your application). (250 words)

In total you will need to write at least 2500 words. Keep in mind that Wharton is flexible about word count:

Essay length? We often get asked about essay length, specifically whether it is OK to go over the number of words suggested. Recognize we do not count words (this would take longer than actually reading the essay), nor does our online system count words (and therefore does not truncate the essay at the specific limit etc.)

+/- 10% is going to be fine (and remain unnoticed). Any more than this and it may become an issue as writing succinctly is a skill that is useful in business and business school. You should also realize your readers are reading multiple essays from multiple applicants so writing long essays is not likely to be a positive.

The exceptions to the above may be if you have a more unusual background (by business school standards) and feel you have a little more to explain (about your less traditional goals, experience etc.) In this case you may need to explain the nature of your experiences in more detail, but this does not give you the license to write at will!

I don't think there is a case where it makes sense to write much less than the suggested word count as the essays are going to be an important component to your application and should be used as such.

Summary: Over or under by 10% is fine. In exceptional cases, more than 10% is fine. Say everything you need to say, but use good judgment.

I frequently have applicants start with Wharton because it is flexible on word count and because the essays that you write for Wharton will be helpful for other applications as well.

Essay 1 (Required)
Describe your career progress to date and your future short-term and long-term career goals. How do you expect a Wharton MBA to help you achieve these goals, and why is now the best time for you to join our program? (1,000 words)

At the Tokyo event, Mr. Caleel made it very clear that applicants should answer the entire question, but it does not need to be answered in any particular order. The question breaks down into the following components:
1. Describe your career progress to date.
2. Describe your future short-term career goals.
3, Describe your future long-term career goals.
4. How do you expect a Wharton MBA to help you achieve these goals?
5. Why is now the best time for you to join our program?

I will not provide much further analysis of this question, but instead, I suggest taking look at my analysis of Chicago GSB Essay 1. If you are having difficulty formulating your goals, please see this post. Regarding learning about Wharton, there is little reason for me to discuss that as you can easily learn about by visiting the Wharton website and their truly excellent MBA Admissions Blog!

ESSAY 2: You can read my already posted analysis of Essay 2 here.

Essay 3 (Required)
Tell us about a situation in which you were an outsider. What did you learn from the experience? (500 words)

This is a very open-ended question that admissions can use to understand how you relate to other people. When thinking about this essay, I suggest you focus on a positive situation where you...
(1) learned how to become an insider;
(2)maintained your status as an outsider, but learned something important about yourself;
(3) maintained your status as an outsider, but learned something important about the group you were outside of;
(4) demonstrate an understanding of group dynamics;
(5) demonstrate cultural sensitivity;
(6) demonstrate self-awareness;
(7) demonstrate the ability to integrate yourself into a new situation and have impact;
(8) demonstrate knowledge about the group/place you were outside of;
AND/OR
(9) demonstrate your independence by embracing the status of outsider in order to have impact, preserve your own ethical standards, and/or position.

My suggestions are inherently abstract because of the many possible ways of positively writing this essay. I don't suggest writing about a failure or setback here because you will have already addressed that topic in Essay 2. As I mention in my analysis of the HBS essays, it is possible to use the same content for Wharton 3 and HBS 3b depending on your choice of topics.

Essay 4 1. Where in your background would we find evidence of your leadership capacity and/or potential? (500 words)
Please see How to write an MBA Leadership Essay. The guidance I provide in that post applies to this question. Unlike the HBS question, you don't necessarily have to focus on a single story, but most applicants will in order to provide a fully developed example.

Essay 4. 2. Is there anything about your background or experience that you feel you have not had the opportunity to share with the Admissions Committee in your application? If yes, please explain. (500 words)
This question is exactly the same as HBS 3f. You should use this essay to focus on an important part of who you are that will help convince Wharton that you belong there. I will provide a more extensive analysis of this question in a future post.

Essay 5 (Optional)
If you feel there are extenuating circumstances of which the Committee should be aware, please explain them here (e.g., unexplained gaps in work experience, choice of recommenders, TOEFL waiver request, inconsistent or questionable academic performance, significant weaknesses in your application). (250 words)

See my post on Chicago GSB's optional question as what I wrote there, applies here as well. At his Tokyo presentation, Mr. Caleel specifically encouraged applicants to use this space if they need to because it is better to tell him the reason then to make him guess. Given that he reads all the applications, I suggest doing so IF YOU NEED TO. Don't write anything if you have no concerns.

Question? Comment or write me at adammarkus@gmail.com
-Adam Markus
アダム マーカス

ハーバード, ウォートン, ビジネススクール, 大学院入学, 合格対策, エッセイ MBA留学
Real Time Web Analytics